luzribeiro: (Default)
[personal profile] luzribeiro
I personally enjoy watching people who are rich and think they are entitled, only go ahead and blow up their careers by making useless comments on Twitter and the like - just because they can. She should have learned from Roseanne Barr and Donald Trump. But no.

'The Mandalorian' Star Gina Carano Fired Amid Social Media Controversy

You know the funniest part? She's comparing Trump supporters to the Jews, even though Trump's supporters include literal Nazis.

I'm glad to see that this person is being held accountable for her actions. This woman has been so problematic in the past and I am pleased to see that she now gets to suffer the consequences. The point of this was to show people like this racist twat that people with hateful and ignorant views should not be given a platform.
mahnmut: (Ngithanda amasende amakhulu.)
[personal profile] mahnmut

This was supposed to be a "funny" piece but it's mostly become a rant. Mostly directed at a certain segment of society, calling themselves various names, from "conservative" to "truther". It was supposed to be funny, mostly due to the nature of the subject, and because of the sheer amount of stupidity that's just begging to be mocked. But no, I've no desire for LULz right now. The amount of stupidity among those people has passed the point of LULzworthiness. It's not funny. It's scary. And frightening. Much scarier than the pandemic, actually. Can't joke about this. Not now.

Illiteracy and ignorance has become trendy and dandy. Ignorant public gurus are lecturing people about stuff they know jack shit about. Illiterate "teachers" are teaching the illiterate kids of semi-literate parents.

Violence-prone folks, wannabe fascists, closet neo-Nazis, unapologetic racists are calling for riots, and they've decided they could get what they want by crying as loud as they can that they're having their freedom of speech assaulted.

Read more... )
dancesofthelight: (Yenelnataru)
[personal profile] dancesofthelight
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/muslims-france-malaysian-pm-mahathir-mohamad-macron-charlie-hebdo-b1424838.html

So, after the latest case of France deciding in the midst of the outbreak of a new wave of Covid 19 (which as someone from the USA at least assures me that the USA isn't the only willfully stupid society that expected a virus to vanish into thin air, and I suspect that Hurricane Laura is the only reason my hometown didn't slide right back into no. 1 outbreak spot in the USA again) to get into yet another kerfluffle over its selective standard of secularism.....

An old fart in Malaysia who was its PM decides the most helpful idea here is to say that Muslims have a right to kill millions of French people with impunity. He looked at the mess in France, decided the thing that would help French Muslims is to go on Twitter and literally try to incite a wave of mass murder and civil war in France

......

With this it's easy to see why I hope he lost his job and that I hope it stays lost.



[identity profile] ddstory.livejournal.com
Loyal servant of billionaire rails against the elite; said billionaire says he's got nothing to do with the man's position (except, he may have).

Donald Trump disavows longtime butler after he called for Obama to be killed

Drumpf may disavow this piece of hate-filled crap all he wants, but the fact of the matter is, it's Drumpf's inflammatory rhetoric itself that has prompted douchey lunatics like this one to come out of the woodwork and presume that they're a force to be reckoned with. It's exactly because of guys like Drumpf - who's only the tip of the huge iceberg of blind hatred and ignorance that has become so inherent to a large chunk of the base of the party that so fiercely wants to pretend it does not identify with him (while, arguably, he has actually shaped himself to be exactly the epitome of that party's perverse ideology).

But fine, let`s bear with this guy )
[identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com


Pretty, isn't she? But as someone once said, "better watch out for the skin deep".

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2014/07/08/israeli-lawmaker-calls-for-genocide-of-palestinians-gets-5000-facebook-likes/

Somewhere, in an attic, is an incredibly ugly portrait...

Isn't rather just a little ironic of a person of this background to be effectively calling for genocide and collective punishment?

What is it that lets people place their nationality, ethnicity, religion as being more important that what is common between all people?

The UK Conservative MP Sir Robin John Maxwell-Hyslop, recalled his visit to the Knesset.

'After lunch, the Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee spoke with great intemperance about the Arabs. When he drew a breath, I was constrained to say, 'Dr Hacohen, I am profoundly shocked that you should preach of other human beings in terms similar to those in which (Nazi) Julius Streicher spoke of the Jews. Have you learned nothing?' I shall remember his reply to my dying day. He smote the table with both hands and said, 'But they are not human beings, they are not people, they are Arabs.' (Hansard, Commons, 18 October 1973)
[identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com

So, the master hater has finally passed on. The one who picketed innumerable funerals, displaying his trademark sign "God hates fags", and "Thank God for dead soldiers". The one who rejoiced at the horrible tragedy of 9/11, ascribing it to a vengeful deity who/which was supposedly pissed at those fuckin' heathens down there, living their godless life of wicked heathendom. Or something.

In the meantime, the actual good Christians and other normal people of faith or without faith or whatever, might be willing to find the inner strength and show this garbage of a human being what true humanity is about, and show his family the common decency he would never have deigned upon others, and refrain from responding to hate with hate, and thus interrupt this vicious circle of pain.

That's all nice and good, but not so fast )
[identity profile] farmerz-agent.livejournal.com
I remember as a teenager my mother making me read books by television evangelist about Satanism because she didn't like my comic book collection. To be fair it was the Marvel Inferno cross over series for you comic book geeks. That was rather evil looking
But stack them up against Westboro Baptist Church....
This is just too wonderful not to share.
The Satanic Temple, a burgeoning community of worship devoted to the Dark Lord, has performed a “Pink Mass” over the grave of Westboro Baptist Church founder Fred Phelps Jr.’s mother. The Pink Mass is a Satanic ritual performed after death that turns the deceased's straight spirit into a homo one—it’s not unlike the Mormon practice of baptizing the dead

http://m.vice.com/read/satanists-turned-the-founder-of-the-westboro-baptist-churchs-mom-gay?utm_souce=vicefbus


I, like almost everyone, hates the Wesboro Baptist Church. My wife was a Baptist and I LOVE going to Baptist church service its fun and positive and uplifting. NOTHING like these evil weird hatefilled, flag stomping, clowns.

Would you tithe to a Satanic church just to help them fund their 'pink mass'?

Check out the pictures pretty sexy.
[identity profile] kinvore.livejournal.com
In light of the recent firestorm of protests over the anti-Muslim film by Nakoula Basseley Nakoula has prompted me to draw a few conclusions.

1. I'm okay with arming our embassies with flame throwers. Technically it's US soil and we have both a right and a duty to protect them. I don't think being offended by a film gives someone the right to violate international laws and treaties and attacking a government that had nothing to do with the offensive film to begin with. If people are willing to walk into a flamethrower in order to voice their displeasure then I'm all for it. Come at me, brah.

2. I'm also okay with shipping the maker(s) of this film off to a Middle Eastern country and letting the protestors deal with them. To me this is beyond a First Amendment issue: just because you can say something doesn't mean you should. I see this as akin to shouting "fire" in a movie theater. They knew this film would provoke violence and they did it anyway, so I don't see why we should allow others to pay for their douchebaggery.

What I'm saying is BOTH sides on this issue are wrong, and to pretend otherwise is foolish. This film shouldn't have been made, and yet we shouldn't give a pass to people to kill others just because they're offended. So I'm not taking a side on this one. A pox on both their houses.
[identity profile] paft.livejournal.com


Richard Orange, Global Post: The deaths of the 77 people Breivik massacred in Norway are sadly all too real. But the killer himself looks more and more like a product of the Internet.



Salon has linked to an interesting article today on Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik and the Internet. Richard Orange’s piece touches on something I’ve described in the past as the “sky is brown” syndrome, that is, the sense of unreality that permeates not just Internet games like World of Warcraft, but Internet communities that are ostensibly discussing real world issues. On an Internet discussion board, for instance, a poster can more easily argue that “the sky is typically brown on a clear day” because in the online world, there is no actual window looking out onto a blue sky.

Read more )
[identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com
Cross-posted to Conservatalk


With the death of Mr. Brietbart there's been a lot of talk about civility in modern politics.

Personally I don't think that "civility" is much of an issue. Hyperbolic Vitriol has been apart of this nation's political dialogue since it's inception and Mr. Brietbart's tactics were simply the continuation of a long and proud american tradition.

That said, at what point should we become concerned?

Obviously, there is a huge gap between heated words and tossing people into ovens and I’d hope that we'd all come to our collective senses before things got that out-of-hand but I find myself wondering just how hard it would be to convince this idiot along with his 200+ cheer-leaders that sending cops door to door to arrest anyone bearing a certain socio-political label is not only OK but a good idea?

Is there a problem or am I just being paranoid?
[identity profile] luzribeiro.livejournal.com
The freedom to be the asshole you want to be on the internet is really a remarkable achievement of human civilization and modern democracy in the 21st century. But as it usually happens in many anarchistic systems, their members soon tend to get annoyed with it and start inventing some rules. And then more rules. And then institutions to enforce them, and dispense justice, whenever someone breaks them...

In some countries, the enthralling pleasure that haters feel from the fact that they can do just about anything on the internet, is getting gradually pushed against by the other breed of people who take upon themselves the hard task of a PC police, who'll bring peace and prosperity on the internets. So the net trolls, who used to be so confident in their anonymous invincibility before, are now beginning to tremble at the sight of the invasive menace of the online authorities, and they'd probably begin to think twice before crossing those lines that they previously deemed so fun and easy to cross.

For the time being these restrictions and the subsequent punishments only work in some separate cases, but still these cases are multiplying. On September 13, a British court sentenced 25 year old Sean Duffy to 18 weeks in prison, and 6 months on probation - currently the maximum sentence for "hating on the internet". Additionally, he's banned from using the social networks for 5 years. Not sure how this will be enforced, but there it is.

As a whole, the punishment came because he used some really cruel language on the internet, and the situation became pretty serious. Basically, Duffy the troll sat on the dock for choosing the wrong victim. Instead of writing spiteful and ugly comments in various known and unknown blogs like most of his fellow trolls, or spewing venom at banks, political parties, government institutions or junk tabloids like any self-respecting professional troll would do, he decided to infest the FB site of the late Natascha McBride.

So what really happened, and what are the implications from it )
[identity profile] dreadfulpenny81.livejournal.com
On January 8, 2011, Congresswoman Gabriell Giffords (D-AZ), a member of her staff, and several of her constituents were shot by Jared Lee Loughner in a store parking lot in Tucson, Arizona. In the wake of the shooting, both sides of the political spectrum called for a stop to "vitriolic rhetoric" that was being blamed for the shooting, with most of the blame being laid by Democrats on Republicans (namely Sarah Palin).

Now, over six months after the incident, it seems the shoe is on other foot. In the past several weeks, we've seen the Congressional Black Caucus on the attack, with hateful speeches made by Maxine Waters and Andre Carson. Just yesterday, Teamsters President Jim Hoffa rallied the crowd in Detroit by saying "Let's take these son of a bitches out" in reference to the Tea Party. Both the White House and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (DNC Chair) have declined to comment on Hoffa's statement.

Today it was reported that a new online game will grant Hoffa's wish.



Screenshots and more info )

Whether people like it or not, Tea Partiers are part of the fabric of American politics. They're Americans who enjoy the same rights, privileges, and problems as every other American in this country. And believe it or not, there are black people in the Tea Party, too. Shocker!

A great political mind once said, "You must be the change you want to see in the world." If the rhetoric was so awful before Giffords was shot and THAT was the fault for the attack in the first place, why are Democrats trying to go back to that (or continue it since the rhetoric never really stopped)?
[identity profile] paft.livejournal.com
Comment from “Jeff” (THIS IS NOT OUR JEFF) posted – and scrubbed the same day -- on Atlas Shrugs, as news of the Anders Breivik attack in Norway unfolded [emphasis added]:

Its Not a bad idea at all. If you have a country that welcomes ISLAMO FASCISTS WHO RAPE AND ABUSE your community and countrymen and govt of libtards
looks the other way…..someone has to take the battle to the enemies
of the people.

No point just sitting and blogging away. Its one way to Put fear back on
libtards and the islamo-fascists. The message is clear – We can hit back.
IN TIMES OF CRUSADES HE WOUD BE A HERO. First martyr / soldier to the 
anti-jihad cause.

IF HE SPEAKS OUT AGAINST ISLAMO FASCISTS, he will have done more
for anti-jihad cause than pamela and her band of bloggers could
do in 10 years of blogging.

Of course Geller does more than blog , but Andersbreivik knew
this won’t work in the land of libtard loonies.


Read more )
[identity profile] jazznut85.livejournal.com
Watching one of the shows in the late afternoon/early evening on cable TV, a panel discussion on a certain topic made me seriously sick to my stomach, but also made me wonder how anyone not affiliated with the Tea Party, the Nazis, or the Westboro Baptist Church would even entertain, for one second, voting for a loon like Michele Bachman. Before I launch into this little diatribe, I will present some background on myself.

I am a 25-year old heterosexual male hailing from a small town on the east side of Washington state, just about 10 miles down the freeway to the Idaho border. I am an agnostic with a deep respect for atheists. Before this, though, I was an extreme conservative, Tea Party supporter who typically would vote straight down the traditional Republican line. I also was raised Catholic, a practicing Christian as an adult who, at one point, even would listen to Christian music exclusively and once worked at a Christian radio station in town. Eventually, I begun researching and "soul searching" if you will, realizing that what I was being fed from all the things I just mentioned were turning me into a hateful person that I, myself, wanted nothing to do with. This, coming from a family who taught me to love all and support this notion accordingly. I am an ex-Christian, liberal (maybe progressive) who, before I allowed myself to be brainwashed starting in college, was a proud member of the Gay/Straight Alliance at my high school. Nowadays, I am a proud Gay ally and aspiring activist for gay rights. Oh yeah, and I listen to NPR not just for my news and commentary, but also to be introduced to new bands and authors.

ANYWAYS, back to what I was going to say. This afternoon, a pundit I was watching led off with the discovery that Michele Bachman is a part owner of her husband's business which....are you ready for this...provides "therapy" to people who, or parents that want their children to be reprogrammed, reconditioned and "cured" of their homosexuality!

I knew from the get-go that Bachman, like Huckabee, is known, first and foremost, to be the biggest of social conservatives than any other candidate that has run in an election nationally in the last twenty years. But while Huckabee is just a garden variety Bible Thumper, this revelation over Bachman is absolute hate. Contrary to what she and her husband believe, not to mention what any given Bible-following place of worship preaches, homosexuality is not something that a person chooses. Also, studies that have been done on such "therapy," which were the kinds of tactics that the Nazis used back during their first reign of horror, have been shown to cause serious brain damage and even bring about suicidal tendencies.

Here's an article on this.

Worst of all, when called on the carpet on such things, Bachmann dodged the question completely by saying something to the effect of "I am running for president of the United States," and some crap about how she's just running a business. They're running a business alright, but they've also received a six-figure sum of government funds to run their brainwashing operation.
[identity profile] kinvore.livejournal.com
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110615/ap_on_re_us/us_muslims_terror_hearings

So NY Congressman Peter King is holding more hearings, this time on violent Islam in prison. It hasn't resulted in nearly as much controversy as his previous hearing where he just attacked "violent Islam" in general, but it's still drawing some protests.

For the record when it comes to violence done in the name of Islam I tend to condemn it rather strongly. Few things annoy me more when my fellow liberals seem to give certain acts a pass, often citing cultural reasons. What gets me is if these acts (such as honor killing and/or the systematic suppression of women) were done in the name of Christianity then they'd be screaming bloody murder. It shouldn't be a different reaction just because it's done by the enemy of your enemy.

That being said these investigations are awful and hateful. I think of it this way: imagine if he held hearings on violent blacks in America. He would be rightfully tarred and feathered for even suggesting it. Why? Because it's not right to suggest an entire group of people is guilty for the actions of a few. These hearings are thinly-veiled hate speech and have no place in Congress.

I'll save you some time, Congressman King. There's violence in the name of Islam. There's violence in the name of Christianity. There's violence in the name of nationalism. There's violence done in many names, so please stop the hateful posturing and work on issues that actually matter, such as jobs.
[identity profile] pmax3.livejournal.com

Pastor Terry Jones of Florida has been widely condemned for burning a copy of the Quran. The condemnation is broadly for his irresponsible behavior - on the grounds that the deaths of US service personnel in Afghanistan would not have happened if the Pastor had not done what he did. What the Pastor did is within the law, but he misused the freedom given to him by law.

 Now it's interesting that Indian law is very different in this regard, and the Pastor would certainly have been booked if he did such a thing here.

 Section 153A of the Indian Penal Code says:

 Whoever (a) by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise, promotes or attempts to promote, on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, or (b) commits any act which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, and which disturbs or is likely to disturb the public tranquility, . . . shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

 Section 295A says: 

Whoever, with deliberate and malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings of any class of [citizens of India], [by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise], insults or attempts to insult the religion or the religious beliefs of that class, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to [three years], or with fine, or with both.

Apparently the pastor's action does not come under hate speech in the U.S., which is fine. Indeed it is actually better that U.S. citizens can responsibly exercise their much less restricted right without misusing it. Or to put it more accurately, that the U.S. society does not face such threats from malicious elements within itself which could create disturbances too serious to be contained by the American law and order machinery. 

The law must not be changed, however... )
[identity profile] squidb0i.livejournal.com
First, what we're actually talking about.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eliminationism

"Eliminationism is the belief that one's political opponents are "a cancer on the body politic that must be excised — either by separation from the public at large, through censorship or by outright extermination — in order to protect the purity of the nation"

Has the self identified 'left' engaged in this as well? Some.

But not to the degree where it is the central thrust of their narrative.
That 'honor' would belong to the self identified 'right'.

In the face of increasing irrelevancy, they've pulled out all the stops and are pushing nonstop fear porn in order to keep their base literally on the edge.

Read more... )
[identity profile] verytwistedmind.livejournal.com

CNN's John King: "Before we go to break, I want to make a quick point. We were having a discussion about the Chicago mayoral race. My friend Andy Shaw used the term 'in the crosshairs' in talking about the candidates. We're trying, we're trying to get away from that language. Andy is a good friend, he's covered politics for a long time, but we're trying to get away from that kind of language."

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/01/18/cnn_apologizes_for_guest_using_term_crosshairs.html <- video


Is this over the top? Have we taken this push for civility to the point were we will once again warp our lexicon to suit the hyper sensitive? Do we need words that are purely for political discussion and nothing else? Jargon more so than lexicon.

I heard on the radio that John Boehner has started calling the health care repeal "a job's crusher' rather than a 'job's killer' [unfounded rumer citation needed]
[identity profile] dwer.livejournal.com
Alright. There's been a lot of argument about whether or not the rhetoric of the right wing could or would incite an unstable person to take action against someone they have been speaking out against. But let's use a more clear example.

If Sarah Palin had said "Instead of running [to represent Arizona] they ought to have her and shoot her. Put her against the wall and shoot her", it would have been pretty clear, no? That would clearly have been inflammatory.

Well, check this out.

"Instead of running for governor of Florida, they ought to have [Rick Scott] and shoot him. Put him against the wall and shoot him." Paul Kanjorski, Congressman for the Pennsylvania 11th district, 1985-2011. He's a Democrat. He said it on October 23rd, 2003. (http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/2011/01/ex-rep-paul-kanjorski-d-pa-fla-gov-rick-scott-they-ought-put-him-)

Now, I'm going to honestly say, I've never heard of this guy, and I didn't hear him say what he did when he said it.

Had I heard him say what he did, I would have spoken against him. What he said was wrong, and incendiary, and violent, and out-rightly so. People should not speak this way about political opponents.

Even worse, Kanjorski is trying to dodge responsibility, much like many of us believe Palin and Rush and others are doing.

Reached by phone Tuesday, Kanjorski said "only fruitcakes" would take his statement about Scott literally. The 73-year-old Democrat from Nanticoke, who this fall lost in his bid for a 14th term representing the 11th Congressional District, admitted he's well known for using "colorful language." "I probably would never have made the statement if I anticipated anything like this happening," Kanjorski said. "It was obviously not in humor, but not literally." (http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/2011/01/kanjorski-only-fruitcakes-would-take-my-call-shoot-governor-liter)

Again, wholly inappropriate, and we should be thankful that someone didn't take his initial statement seriously. Anyone who calls for violence against political opponents, whether openly or masked in metaphor, left or right, republican or democrat, should be repudiated.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      
OSZAR »