[identity profile] dreadfulpenny81.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
On January 8, 2011, Congresswoman Gabriell Giffords (D-AZ), a member of her staff, and several of her constituents were shot by Jared Lee Loughner in a store parking lot in Tucson, Arizona. In the wake of the shooting, both sides of the political spectrum called for a stop to "vitriolic rhetoric" that was being blamed for the shooting, with most of the blame being laid by Democrats on Republicans (namely Sarah Palin).

Now, over six months after the incident, it seems the shoe is on other foot. In the past several weeks, we've seen the Congressional Black Caucus on the attack, with hateful speeches made by Maxine Waters and Andre Carson. Just yesterday, Teamsters President Jim Hoffa rallied the crowd in Detroit by saying "Let's take these son of a bitches out" in reference to the Tea Party. Both the White House and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (DNC Chair) have declined to comment on Hoffa's statement.

Today it was reported that a new online game will grant Hoffa's wish.



The game, developed by StarvingEyes (whose clients include NASCAR, Pepsi/Mountain Dew, and several companies in the entertainment industry) allows players to use a variety of weapons such as Uzis and crowbars to physically annihilate zombie versions of Newt Gingrich, Bill O'Reilly, the Koch brothers, and Sarah Palin.

Screenshots, anyone?


What do you know, the stereotypical image of a Tea Partier -- a KKK member.


Yet another stereotype -- the overall-wearing, trailor trash redneck, complete with rebel flag and Obama/Joker poster.


Zombie Sarah Palin (Hope they got the rights to use this image)


Yes, you too can bash the brains of Newt and Bill in the post-apocalyptic Fox News studio.

[Screenshots and client list from National Review Online and The Gateway Pundit]

As one person commented (via NRO), it would be deemed racist and sexist if this were done with Democrats as the targets, so why is no one from the Left condemning this kind of thing when the Liberal-minded are at fault?

Whether people like it or not, Tea Partiers are part of the fabric of American politics. They're Americans who enjoy the same rights, privileges, and problems as every other American in this country. And believe it or not, there are black people in the Tea Party, too. Shocker!

A great political mind once said, "You must be the change you want to see in the world." If the rhetoric was so awful before Giffords was shot and THAT was the fault for the attack in the first place, why are Democrats trying to go back to that (or continue it since the rhetoric never really stopped)?

(no subject)

Date: 7/9/11 03:04 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] notmrgarrison.livejournal.com
Maybe it's that it was at an event that Obama spoke at and Obama isn't saying anything about it?

The White House is using the "he didn't hear it" excuse (again).

(no subject)

Date: 7/9/11 03:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meus-ovatio.livejournal.com
No, the actual thing is that if and until someone gets shot and murdered in a high-profile case, it won't register. But you know, people have a terrible time with differential reasoning.

(no subject)

Date: 7/9/11 03:13 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] notmrgarrison.livejournal.com
You were right about being confused. When the people said "why is no one condemning this kind of thing when the Liberal-minded are at fault?" they meant why aren't the liberals, especially the president who spoke at the event, condemning it, or at the very least not ignoring it.

This makes your "I see a lot of people condemning it actually" a bit obtuse.

(no subject)

Date: 7/9/11 03:13 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meus-ovatio.livejournal.com
No, it sort of makes my point about the deeper hypocrisies involved.

(no subject)

Date: 7/9/11 03:28 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meus-ovatio.livejournal.com
But we already answered that question. No one ain't got shotted yet.

(no subject)

Date: 7/9/11 08:59 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
So, it's only vitriolic rhetoric when something happens? Again, that wasn't what was claimed previously when it was right-wing "rhetoric" that was a problem.

(no subject)

Date: 7/9/11 14:17 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meus-ovatio.livejournal.com
So, it's only vitriolic rhetoric when something happens?
No, it only elicits widespread response and reaction when something happens to scare people.

(no subject)

Date: 7/9/11 20:25 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meus-ovatio.livejournal.com
No that wasn't my point. There was a question, I answered it. Are you familiar with how this works?

(no subject)

Date: 8/9/11 01:06 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com
How does your exchange with other people relate to me? Everything is about me.

(no subject)

Date: 7/9/11 03:53 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] notmrgarrison.livejournal.com
Hopefully you were commenting from email.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      
OSZAR »