Talk politics.

I mean now the USA will finally be overtly intervening with what will either spark a civil war (because to be crudely frank Maduro, like Chavez, has an army and the other guy doesn't and dictators always like shooting first knowing that as long as they say 'death to the Great Satan/American imperialism' a good portion of the US and global media will defend the shot up corpses as the price of progress and an inevitable good thing) or at least a massacre in an oil-rich state that isn't a mostly Muslim one.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-46980913

To be equally fair, I've never understood the immense gulf in the global left's view of Hugo Chavez versus Nicolas Maduro. Ideologically Maduro is far the better choice for the Left, he's a genuine proletarian, and much more ideologically consistent. All Chavez proves is that anyone who defends him and hates Pinochet only hates a military coup not given the appropriate magic words, not a generals' putsch on principle.

In particular articles like this are the purest quality of horseshit, written to obfuscate that Chavez played as fast and loose with banning opposition as Maduro's done, and that both of them created a petrostate one-trick pony of an economy that has the same problem all the others do.

https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2017/05/maduro-chavez-170513145531916.html

To be fair some media coverage grudgingly recognizes a general who tried the same stunt Pinochet did wasn't a guy who created an 'economic miracle' but instead your average garden variety Santa Anna/Juan Peron wannabe who had a good PR firm that enabled the global Left to suddenly rally behind a military despot of the kind they otherwise usually savor their biggest volleys for whenever they're not focused monomaniacally on the USA.

http://theconversation.com/how-todays-crisis-in-venezuela-was-created-by-hugo-chavezs-revolutionary-plan-6147

Essentially, I think that Maduro's gotten a bum rap, and that on the basis of the sterling successes of prior US intervention that he may have actually achieved a miracle of his own because at the rate the USA's Reverse Midas Touch factor applies, odds are just as well he ends up making the entire northern part of South America his bitch, routing a pro-US coup by simple 1989 China methods, and becoming a more successful Fidel Castro with an oilfield. He's no better and no worse than Chavez, it's just that when Chavez died the myth that Venezuela was anything but a corrupt despotic petrodictatorship fell with him and his successor was never able to recreate it save in the eyes of the people making martyrs out of people like the House of Kim.

This is also the first time in a while that the USA has openly endorsed interference in Venezuelan politics, which is especially ironic given all the hullabaloo about Russian intervention. I think the real crime Putin did in the eyes of Americans was reminding us that we're not that different in the right hands from what we've done to other countries, and are no more immune to it than they are. When the USA does this to other countries, it's the god-given right of an empire to fuck with the sovereignty and electoral processes of other states, while God help the person who dares to treat the USA thus!

Naturally too I expect literally no major US media outlets will ever notice this bit of dissonance at any point in the whole mess here, and will take for granted that when the Colossus of the North clenches its Infinity Gauntlet that it is thus perfectly fulfilling its balanced geopolitical role, and not a case of imperialist hypocrisy to Biblical proportions.