kiaa: (Default)
[personal profile] kiaa
Well, it finally happened. Germany is out of the nuclear power game...and since it can't yet fill the gap with renewable energy, it went right back to gas and even coal. Coal! Predictably, the pro-fossil fuel, pro-pollution, pro-climate change Green Party activists are taking a victory lap. Because in Germany (and much of Europe), being "green" isn't about environmentalism as much as it's about luddism.

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/04/15/europe/germany-nuclear-phase-out-climate-intl/index.html

From the outside in, support for nuclear is how I test for whether people are serious when they claim to believe in some form of climate-driven catastrophism. If they mean what they say, then THEY should be nuclear's biggest cheerleaders.
nairiporter: (anime_1)
[personal profile] nairiporter
Piney Point: Emergency crews try to plug Florida toxic wastewater leak

Usual thing. A private landowner who knew all about the environmental risks when he bought the property (Piney Point), is seeking $6M in public money to fix the problem. Standard practice in the US!

So, he has done nothing and now it's somebody else's problem. Good thing for the private landowner. He will be sitting pretty after the taxpayer bailout. As for the environment, well... who cares about that when there is money to be made!

Will the companies who created this problem be billed for the mess? Will they wriggle out of paying and leave the tax-payer with the costs? Privatised profits, socialised losses.
fridi: (Default)
[personal profile] fridi
A couple of months ago, a coalition of 145 environmental organizations wrote Biden a letter urging him to prohibit all fossil executives, lobbyists, and representatives from his campaign, cabinet, and advisory team, in addition to just banning their money. The letter was apparently written in response to reports that as recently as 2019, Biden had advisers with connections to natural gas companies.

Biden’s team did not respond to that letter, which is no surprise now, knowing that he has hired Cedric Richmond (who is not a direct representative of the fossil fuel industry, but appears to have pretty close ties). Hopefully, both Biden and Richmond's days of ceding to the fossil fuel industry are long behind them, and they'll work together to listen to climate activists and fight the climate crisis.

But you'll forgive me if I don't hold my breath.
airiefairie: (Default)
[personal profile] airiefairie
http://visionofhumanity.org/indexes/ecological-threat-register/

Last month this report made the headlines. It was full of almost apocalyptic predictions, like a new mass migration on a global scale in result of climate change, and severe water and food shortages throughout Asia and Africa.

The report was done by several international research centers, including the Institute of Economics and Peace. It comes out just at the time of the 5th anniversary of the first migrant wave to Europe. There is an overarching sense of doom and threat hanging over the world and modern civilisation all throughout the report, the issue of migration being closely related to the urgent need of response to environmental change.

Here are some of the conclusions )
tcpip: (Default)
[personal profile] tcpip
Writing about the politics of public health whilst we are the midst of a major global pandemic is a peculiar combination of churlishness and critical necessity. At the time of writing, there are 425,000 confirmed cases, and 19,000 deaths, and in a few days that number will double, and then double again, and then double again. It is worth remembering that the first 100,000 diagnoses took from December to March, the second from March 5 to 17, and the third from March 18 to 21, and the fourth from March 22 to 24. It is the single greatest health risk of this century, in part due to the relatively high rate of fatalities (approximately 4.1% of diagnosed cases), and significantly due to the relative ease of transmission. Most of all, however, the greatest risk is the effects of the ease of transmission and fatality rate combined, that is, how it overwhelms our health-care systems, which are woefully unprepared for an event such as this.

But it is not as if that the knowledge was not there. There have been plenty of warning signs, such the previous outbreaks of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in late 2002 to mid-2003, which is related to COVID-19, to the extent that academics warned of SARS as "an agent of emerging and reemerging infection". SARS had a fatality rate of 9.6% across 17 countries, with approximately 8,000 people infected. SARS was also highly infectious (R0 value of 2-4), but was successfully contained. Then in 2009, there was the Pandemic H1N1/09 virus ("swine flu"), which had a higher infection rate than seasonal influenza, and a similar fatality rate. In comparison Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), also a coronavirus, has a high fatality rate (36%) but a low transmission rate (R0 value of 0.3 to 0.8).

Recognising these rather impressive precursors, certain individuals also have tried to raise concerns. Michael Osterholm of the University of Minnesota, argued in 2005 that "Time is running out to prepare for the next pandemic. We must act now with decisiveness and purpose", and in 2017 had his book, "Deadliest Enemy: Our War Against Killer Germs" published. Virologist and flu expert Robert G. Webster warned of an upcoming 'flu pandemic, “Flu Hunter: Unlocking the secrets of a virus" late last year. The US Intelligence Team has warned about the possibility of a pandemic for years. Dr. Luciana Borio, once a member of the White House National Security Council (NSC) team responsible for pandemics, warned of pandemic threats; the team was disbanded under the Trump administration. Famously, Bill Gates argued in a TED talk in 2015, that we simply were not prepared.

Read more... )

The System Kills

It is the system that is killing us. Yes, the direct cause is from a deadly infectious disease and part of that is, of course, the potential rate of transmission from a world that is a smaller place. But that could be managed with proper environmental considerations and animal welfare regulations in place. They are not in place because of the terrible levels of global inequality, the lack of social infrastructure in developing countries, and most of all because they would cost money. Our political economy is geared towards providing a race to the bottom in terms of value, and a race to the top for monopoly profits, which inevitably must be shared among fewer and fewer. Add to this either sensationalist private media which concerns itself more with shock value for sales rather than accuracy, and totalitarian media systems which have the facts at hand, but refuse to release them as to retain their social order, or engage in disruption through misinformation directed to more liberal societies. Managing the entire rotten edifice is the worst sort of political leaders whose concern for public welfare is demonstrably lacking in favour of their quest for perpetual power, manipulation of public opinion, and fulfilling their mission of their true masters. The irrational quest for the accumulation of power and wealth, at a cost of the lives of human and non-human animals, has reached the insanity that we witness today. The next pandemic, however, will be worse if these causes are not addressed; public health, media transparency, and the environment will not occur without smashing these accumulations in favour of more egalitarian power structures and a greater commonwealth. The warning has been given by this virus; and if the system does not show itself capable of reform, then revolution will be inevitable.
airiefairie: (Default)
[personal profile] airiefairie
The exponential spread of the new virus on a global scale poses a number of problems, some of them existential. So it may come as a surprise when I say that there is at least one positive effect from it. And it is the ecological effect. The levels of pollution, and the greenhouse gas emissions in the large cities and industrial regions, have significantly diminished due to the effects of the pandemic on the production processes and transportation.

Coronavirus: Air pollution and CO2 fall rapidly as virus spreads
Now, I will not go as far as to claim that dolphins have returned in the canals and lagoons of Venice (which has proven to be fake news), but the fact is that the CO2 emissions from cars in NYC have decreased almost two-fold compared to the same time last year (traffic itself has decreased by 35%).

It's safe to say that many big megapolises around the world are now breathing by far the cleanest air in years.

Read more... )
fridi: (Default)
[personal profile] fridi
Jeff Bezos Donating $10 Billion Barely Dents His Surging Fortune

Jeff Bezos obviously has no sense of irony. By vowing to donate 10 billion dollars for fighting climate change, he must imagine himself a true champion of the environment. In fact, that's only drawing the public attention to the ecological madness behind Amazon's business model. In this situation, to throw money around and claim you're fighting for the environment is just insanely hypocritical.

Read more... )
tcpip: (Default)
[personal profile] tcpip
A year ago the Australian government declared that the Bramble Cay Melomys was officially extinct. This little rat animal on a 5-hectare island some 50 kilometres off the coast of Papua New Guinea. Whilst it was once numerous, surveys in 1998, 2002, and 2004 estimated that the population was less than a hundred. Affected by sea level rises and increased tropical storms, surveys in 2011 and 2014 found no trace of the animal. Finally, in 2015 a rescue mission was sent. But by then it was too late; there was none left. Whilst the Queensland government declared soon afterwards its extinction, the Australian government waited until 2019 for the official national declaration.

The world had witnessed its first mammal extinction due to climate change.

The Guardian cartoonist First Dog on the Moon wrote a superb piece of the day, declaring that Feb 18 would be known as Bramble Cay Melomys Remembrance Day, and gave a utopian message of what the tale would bring, but also with the conclusion: "None of this will happen - we have already forgotten this little creature".

As is my wont, I was determined not to forget; I marked the day in my diary. As the day approached I wondered what could be done. Now, as you would know Australian has gone through a period of horrific bushfires. More than a billion animals have died. A friend in Canberra remarked that Australia needs a memorial for extinct and endangered animals, to inform, to educate, and yes, even to grieve. I suggested extending it to a memorial and museum. A petition has been written that will be presented to the Australian parliament to establish such an institution. A Facebook group has been established. Flyers have been produced (including one in Chinese, for Year of the Rat). Groups of people will be meeting across the country (and I'll be starting in New Zealand) - and First Dog on the Moon has made a second cartoon.

All of this is just one small contribution in what is a global concern that arises from climate change and a wanting to provide a voice for the voiceless. Institutions have a degree of permanence and power, and in politics that makes them a good target for change. Demonstrations too, are effective, not just for the publicity and disruption to existing powers that they can bring, but also as a means of providing a sense of solidarity between those with a common interest.

Little brown rat, we will not forget you. We will fight for all the other endangered animals, as we did not fight for you.
mahnmut: (WTF-E?)
[personal profile] mahnmut
Dutch proposal* to dam the North Sea, protecting Europe from rising sea Levels. Technically feasible but est. cost €750Bn.



A few thoughts. First off, has the genius author of this plan weighed the environmental consequences of such a drastic alteration? Also, how are they planning to dam the 700m deep Norwegian Trench?

Besides, this whole project would be actually stealing coastlines from other countries. It would also be catastrophic for sea life. Why not tackle climate change and therefore the rise of sea level instead?

* (BTW this is just an idea from a Dutch ocean expert. This hasn't been officially proposed by the government. Don't even think they are seriously considering this).

All in all, this is indeed very Dutch :D
But I think we should rather invest the money into prevention and possibly carbon storage technologies.
kiaa: (funky)
[personal profile] kiaa
This is a thread dedicated to those that wish to put up something from nature, which is beautiful.

Can be almost anything you like, but try to keep with the ethos. Maybe a location you have visited, at a certain time of day? Or would like to? Maybe an amazing display of nature, from the animal kingdom.

Pics, You Tube vids, if it looks good, and it's beautiful, share it;

In what seems like an ugly world at times, don't we all need some light and beauty?
airiefairie: (Default)
[personal profile] airiefairie
https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html

This is the annual statistical report of BP for the year. I have read all sorts of interpretations on the media since, and every time I am amazed how far from reality could both activists and lobbyists go as they spin in search of arguments to match their particular political agenda. So let's just put the numbers on the table, and ask a few logical questions which every thinking person could answer for themselves.

The report includes lots of details; here is just one of the graphs.



Now the facts. Since the signing of the Kyoto protocol in 1997, the world has largely vowed to limit its carbon emissions. In result, we have been hearing, talking, promoting and investing into the so called transition to renewables, a new energy revolution that is defining our epoch. So here is where we are as of now...

Read more... )
luzribeiro: (Default)
[personal profile] luzribeiro
As the international public is fixated on the wildfires in Brazil, another similar disaster is suffocating Central Africa.

More fires burning in Angola and Congo than in the Amazon:

Angola alone has seen over 10 thousand wildfires, compared to Brazil's 2127. At the G-7 meeting in France, president Macron advocated very actively for funding the fight against the disaster in the Amazon. But those can hardly be compared to Africa. Much of the annual wildfires in Africa are due to traditional forms of agriculture and stock breeding, and they regularly affect actual rainforest, not pasture lands and shrublands like is the case in Brazil.

Also, using fire for driving game during hunting, for soil cultivation, for clearing up land for crops, pastures and roads, for fighting pests, is an ancient tradition and is practiced throughout Africa. It's still the preferred method, especially in rural areas of low income, where agriculture is not yet mechanized. It's the more efficient and economic way of fighting some pests and crop diseases. What's more, the ash is a good fertilizer, although only a short-term one.



Read more... )
nairiporter: (Default)
[personal profile] nairiporter

The Amazon is Earth's lungs, producing 1/5 of the global O2. And now it's burning. It is literally turning to char - at a tremendous speed. As we recently mentioned here, the Brazilian president is subject to fierce criticism for his aggressive rhetoric and his inadequate policy that has allowed widespread fires to be started on purpose. He has removed reputed ecology experts, and silenced them whenever they have published conclusions that he doesn't like.

There is good reason for all the criticism. But is his rhetoric and his reactions such a surprise? What else could be expected from a right-wing populist like himself? The more heated the debate, the more controversy his actions cause, the higher the indignation, the less he and his government are prone to negotiate. They will only be hardening their position. And that's not in anyone's interest.

Read more... )
mahnmut: (WTF-E?)
[personal profile] mahnmut
(First of all, haha, I'm using InfoWars as a source LOL!)

WTF? ‘Supervillain’ Elon Musk Wants To ‘Nuke Mars’



Most folks laugh and say he's crazy (and yeah, evil too). Cuz he's talking about nukes, and stuff. Essentially, nuke the poles, he says. Melting/vaporizing the ice and creating some more atmosphere would be nice, he says.

As to the radiation, we've set off plenty here on Earth and, I imagine the radiation exposure on Mars due to lack of sun blocking atmosphere is far worse than what would be added by nuclear weapons. At the very least, nuking Mars is unlikely to make the environment there any worse, and if it does, it's not going to hurt anything anyway. That's his argument.

Read more... )
OSZAR »