[identity profile] johnny9fingers.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Given that the "War on Drugs" appears to the rest of the world to be lost:

www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-13624303 

I wonder what would make the US finally give it up as a lost cause?

Is it that there is just too much invested in the "War" for the US powers-that-be to relinquish one of its sacred cows? Or given the CIA's historic role in Latin America, and in various "drugs for weapons" and "drugs for freedom" operations world-wide (TM Oliver North, Taliban insurgency, et al) would liberalising the drugs laws run counter to US interests?

My own opinion is that we should legalise immediately. But I may just be an old hippie.

(no subject)

Date: 3/6/11 01:55 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] onefatmusicnerd.livejournal.com
Wrong hostages... the hostages in the arms for hostages deal were Americans who had been taken by the Iranian backed Hezbollah movement in Lebanon.

(no subject)

Date: 3/6/11 02:03 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hardblue.livejournal.com
My main point was that we were giving arms to the Iranians for hostages, on which we seem to agree.

(no subject)

Date: 3/6/11 02:18 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
As I understood it, US involvement in Lebanon was to try to keep Israel's fat out of the fire, that came to a screeching halt with the Beirut bombing and then Reagan cut and ran. I do know that proto-Hezbollah did that to the USSR and the Soviets ended terrorists fucking with them for the rest of the USSR's existence.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
1617 1819 202122
23242526272829
30      
OSZAR »