A proposal
13/4/09 12:43![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
mijopo.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
talkpoliticsI understand that the moderators don't like to delete posts in this community, fair enough. I'd like to make a simple suggestion; why don't we all contribute to quality control by making a more concerted effort to stop feeding the trolls? You know the argument. If people stopped responding to posts made solely with the intent to inflame, the motivation for making these posts would be removed. People who wanted to trigger discussion would have to posit something sensible and cogent rather than just something inflammatory, the quality of posts increases and almost everyone, except the troll(s), is happier.
(Sorry to spam the list with this, but in my defense, I think it's more relevant to members of the community than many of the things recently posted.)
(Sorry to spam the list with this, but in my defense, I think it's more relevant to members of the community than many of the things recently posted.)
(frozen) (no subject)
Date: 13/4/09 17:07 (UTC)Seriously though. I second the proposal.
Meanwhile, the trolls will keep being shot on spot.
(from a new post)
LILITH (
the word -Troll- is specific to European mythology, using it disparagingly is RACIST
use the word PESTER
such as -the moderator of this community is a PESTER and a punk-
saying -ban the troll- is just like -ban the jew- or -ban the nigger-
now, would you racist PESTERS knock it off?
(no subject)
Date: 13/4/09 17:15 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 13/4/09 17:32 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 13/4/09 17:11 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 13/4/09 17:17 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 13/4/09 17:33 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 13/4/09 17:43 (UTC)BTW next time he spams please lock it down instead of deleting it. We may be able to get him banned from LJ if we can provide enough proof. I'm glad we log IP addresses.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:For the record:
From:(no subject)
From:Re: For the record:
From:(no subject)
Date: 13/4/09 17:51 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 13/4/09 18:11 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 13/4/09 18:49 (UTC)In his defense...
Date: 13/4/09 19:29 (UTC)That is who this is about right?
Re: In his defense...
Date: 13/4/09 19:55 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Re: In his defense...
From:;)
From:Re: ;)
From:Re: ;)
From:Re: ;)
From:(no subject)
Date: 13/4/09 19:33 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 13/4/09 19:37 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 13/4/09 20:06 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 13/4/09 21:06 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 13/4/09 21:38 (UTC)A standard of quality has to be initially imposed before members adopt it.
Think about it, seriously: the energy once invested into preparing deliberately incendiary submissions wont be worth spending if the outcome cant be published. It compels members to use their energy wisely, and take political debate seriously.
(no subject)
Date: 13/4/09 22:48 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 13/4/09 21:49 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 13/4/09 23:55 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/4/09 11:19 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/4/09 01:37 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/4/09 10:14 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:The history of Kharmii.
From:Re: The history of Kharmii.
From:Re: The history of Kharmii.
From:(no subject)
From: