[identity profile] pastorlenny.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Was just watching Obama's press conference. When asked about US oil reserves and rising oil prices, he cited two reaons for those rising prices: growing demand by growing economies (such as China and Brazil) and concerns about instability in the Mideast.

Why would he not include the influence of purely speculative capital chasing market-gaming profits in his analysis? Are we so naive as to believe that the oil market is simply governed by supply and demand? Does no one understand how commodity markets work -- and how readily they are manipulated by capital interests?

Protip: Every barrel of oil is subject to 15-27 speculative trades before it is consumed. And regulators have absolutely no way of governing this activity.

(no subject)

Date: 11/3/11 22:02 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
I found this (Goldman Sachs has a big role in driving up oil prices for a variety of reasons, too long to get into here, but there's plenty of information available on the Internet on how!):


Tne way to attempt to constrain these volatile mini-bubbles is for the Commodities Futures Trading Commission to impose “position limits,” essentially limits on the size of the bets that speculators can make. The New Deal–era Commodities Exchange Act gives the CFTC power to curb “excessive speculation,” and the just-passed Dodd-Frank bill explicitly calls for the CFTC to promulgate position limits.

Not surprisingly, the big Wall Street banks like Goldman Sachs don’t want this, and the two Republican members of the commission don’t favor any position limits rules with real teeth. To his great credit, CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler (a former Goldman banker I was quite critical of when nominated to the position) has taken a strong leadership position in advocating strong limits, and Democratic commissioner Bart Chilton has been supportive as well. That leaves the deciding vote in the hands of Democratic Commissioner Michael Dunn, who’s expressed misgivings.

Now, it just so happens Dunn’s term is up in June and last night MSNBC’s Ed Show reported that the White House has begun vetting his replacement. This may seem obscure and technical, but given the precariousness of the recovery and political explosiveness of gas prices, nominating a replacement enthusiastic about reigning in excessive speculation may be the single most important decision the White House makes between now and Election Day.
Edited Date: 11/3/11 22:03 (UTC)

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      
OSZAR »