[identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
Hello again, fellow political junkies! It's time for our new installment of ridiculously over-simplified hypothetical situations that you, being the benevolent ruler of your fictional state as per the NationStates model, would have to collide with. You know, your extremist decisions are somehow supposed to shape up your country in the way you deem most suitable. The last time when we had one of these polls, most of you sided with the CEO of a high-tech manufacturer, who argued that not only should robot wives be allowed to be produced, but there should be more competition on the market. But now the issue is a bit different, namely:

The Issue

A recently released book authored by Jennifer Nixon, your former Human Services Minister, has highlighted the financial and mental health concerns of parents in Insert Country Name. The book has thrust the issue of childcare back into the public spotlight.

The Debate & a Poll )
[identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
Pro-life groups have promoted the notion that Planned Parenthood is a racist organization dedicated to the genocide of African Americans and other marginalized peoples of color. Their case is based on a few flawed assumptions and some deliberate misrepresentations. They attack Margaret Sanger with fury in such a way that exposes the deceptive nature of their mission. They take information out of context in order to make it signify the opposite of its true significance. They use a poorly structured, possibly criminal, telephone study to put Planned Parenthood in a negative light. They lean on the sentiments of racially sensitive African American leaders to associate Planned Parenthood with authentic racist elements in American society. They display a lack of understanding of what genocide really is.

In her autobiography, Margaret Sanger describes her first encounter with a KKK women's auxiliary group. Her description of the encounter puts the Klan women in a dim light. She describes the experience as bizarre and the women as poorly educated. Pro-lifers ignore this aspect of her account and go so far as to characterize the meeting as a Klan rally when it was not. They also fail to consider the fact that Sanger was at the meeting to talk about her own mission of promoting women's rights, not the Klan's mission.

Pro-lifers also misrepresent Sanger's relationship with the eugenics movement. Her autobiography contains references indicating a sympathy with the movement, but it also contains indications that she had difficulty getting the eugenics advocates to support her own work. Eugenics depends on involuntary sterilization rather than voluntary methods. Sanger's mission was reducing the burden on women that comes with unplanned pregnancy. She sought to empower women to take control of their own fertility. Eugenics does the opposite by denying women control. Pro-lifers deliberately ignore the fact that the most extreme advocates of eugenics opposed reproductive freedom. The Nazis shut down family planning programs in their territory.

One of the more pathetic attacks on Planned Parenthood involved "researchers" who called Planned Parenthood offices with deliberate racist appeals. (The calls may have been recorded illegally.) The racist calls claimed to advocate the abortion of African Americans out of fear of competition. Planned Parenthood has a policy of allowing donors to target their funds to a specific ethnic group. Pro-lifers claim that this makes them racist when it is the donors that are racist. The irony of the competition argument is that planned families probably have more competitive children than unplanned families. The calls were reproduced in the propaganda film "Maafa 21" which admits that the project was funded by Live Action, a pro-life group.

The film also parades the work of Samuel Yette to support the contention that there was a conspiracy to use birth control as a weapon of genocide. Yette's work is an excellent treatise on the assault on civil rights by the Nixon administration and other racist politicians. He details the reaction in Washington to a situation of near-famine conditions in the rural South. Southern states were diverting federal food subsidies intended for the poor away from African American communities. As part of the reaction to this situation, certain congressional leaders attempted to advance legislation that would make abortion and sterilization mandatory for young unwed women. Planned Parenthood was mentioned as being the only health care available for free to poor blacks in the South. There is absolutely nothing in Yette's work that links Planned Parenthood to the racists who supported forced abortion and sterilization.


The attack on Planned Parenthood has exposed the pro-life movement to ridicule. It has attempted to enlist minorities in a program that is detrimental to minority interests. It uses deceptive tactics that reflect poorly on the movement. It exploits the work of people like Yette who stands at an opposite political pole. Most embarrassing, it demonstrates an unfamiliarity with what actually constitutes genocide.

Links: Arina Grossu repeating propaganda about Sanger and the Klan. Margaret Sanger's autobiography. Samuel Yette's work on Nixon administration misdeeds.
[identity profile] ddstory.livejournal.com
Sooo dudes & dudettes, on this special day, no other question could be more romantic than asking you what the most boring work you usually do at home is, mhmmm? ;)



[Poll #1956768]
[identity profile] paft.livejournal.com
Stuart Varney: Why don’t you just spend more time with the family, let somebody else work, you go on Obamacare… Stay home, spend more time with the family, let somebody else pay for your healthcare…


It began as the usual Obamacare Horror Story “Bombshell” going pfffffft. We’ve seen it happen, over and over again. A supposedly dire effect of the Affordable Care Act gets cited, which, on examination, turns out to involve someone who could easily afford it paying a higher premium or (in the case of “Bette,” cited during a Republican response to the SOTU) someone who’s been “victimized” by her own refusal to use the options offered by the ACA.

The latest involves the release of the Congressional Budget Office’s report on the impact of the ACA. “Law will reduce fulltime employment by about 2 million,” it was announced. “Healthcare Law will reduce hours worked by about 1.5% to 2% from 2017-2024”

“You wonder how they explain it,” exclaimed a Fox Anchor.

Wouldn’t you know it, CBO director Doug Elmendorf went and spoiled everything by explaining it. See, it’s not so much a matter of jobs being eliminated. It’s a matter of many workers now having the option of reducing their hours or, if they have enough savings, retiring completely from the workforce. As the report says (emphasis added),

The estimated reduction stems almost entirely from a net decline in the amount of labor that workers choose to supply, rather than from a net drop in businesses' demand for labor…


So what’s the next step on the right? Act outraged that many workers will actually be in a position to, not just leave jobs they dislike for jobs they prefer, but also cut back on their work hours so they can spend more time with their (get this) families.

Read more )
[identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
Liberals who have been oohing and aahing over the new vicar of Caesar Jesus, the Ignatian Pontifex Maximus named after the monk of Assisi, now have reason to check their emotional optimism at the cathedral vestibule. Frank encouraged a Maltese prelate to speak out on his own opposition to adoptions by same-sex couples. Is this based on a sociological study of adoption outcomes depending on parent gender, or is it based on the medieval custom of clerical despotism and the perception of homosexual activity as the moral equivalent of the rapists of Sodom? For some reason the former seems unlikely.

The reactionary cleric, Auxiliary Bishop Charles Scicluna, made the dangerous connection to the family status of the prophet from Nazareth. If we are to take that as a pattern of family life for the entire planet, everyone would need to be raised by a biological mother and an adoptive father. That is as practical as the ban on contraceptives. The important aspect of this drama is the way that sacred texts are abused in order to rationalize vicious and brutal policy positions that are more in the spirit of a Kaiser or a Czar than that of an ancient sage.

An advocate of Rome's position might point out that the Roman clergy know more about homosexual relations than anyone else. The priesthood and the monastery were traditional sanctuaries for men and women who felt attraction for their own gender rather than for the opposite gender. They know the absurdity of the medieval practice of referring to a priest as a "father" when he is actually more like a tax collector or a pharisee. We should trust the opinion of Roman clerics on such matters just as we trusted them when they insisted that there could not possibly be people on the other side of the Earth. (On a more serious note, conservative innovators have now come up with a new right for a child to have a parent of each gender.)

In response to such sympathy we need only point to the predatory practices of the corrupt and despotic clerics as an example of what to avoid. Rather than channeling sexuality into a priesthood of political domination, same sex marriage and parenting channels it into a more natural condition, despite what the material Creator of the flat and immobile Earth might think.

Do you suppose that Frank agrees with Scicluna's position on adoption, or do you suspect that by encouraging him to speak out he was throwing the poor guy under the bus? What is your take on the conservative effort to deny rights to adults by creating new rights for children?

Links: Ariadne Massa on the meeting between the pope and Scicluna. A conservative Catholic, Nick Donnelly, advocates protecting the "right" of children to a parent of each gender by opposing same-sex adoption.
[identity profile] airiefairie.livejournal.com

Our kids are the sunshine of our life. But you have to admit, raising them could be a real pain at times. From changing tons of diapers to delicately addressing teenage breakdowns, the road of the parent is long and thorny. Without a great deal of sense of humour and quick wits, dads and moms would probably struggle to cope. And also, any tips and a few suggestions for ingenious tricks from parents with experience and expertise might be extremely helpful. So here are a few ideas that may seem crazy at first sight! =)

Stand in awe at the resourcefulness of dads and moms! )
[identity profile] prog-expat.livejournal.com

Oi. Where to begin?

It should be apparent to anybody that knows me even a little that I'm not a "drown it in the bathtub" sort when it comes to government. Fix it, don't sabotage it or destroy it outright. While there are a lot of things wrong with government in the US, I don't see us at a point where it's time to douse the whole thing in gasoline and light a match.

That said, there are some things that absolutely have to go (list not comprehensive) )
[identity profile] nairiporter.livejournal.com
The monthly topic reminds me of this.

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/02/world/asia/china-elderly-law

Strange things are happening in China these days. Since July 1, a new law codifies the relations between parents and children, and makes the care for the elders an obligation. As of now, the Chinese are obliged to visit their aging parents frequently. Even if they are on non-speaking terms, or live thousands of km away.

By tradition, Chinese children are taught early that it is their duty to love and respect their parents. They recite verses in school about the principles of Confucianism. In his writings, Confucius encourages children to respect their elders and preaches that this respect is a fundamental element of moral behaviour, and a brick in the structure of any well-functioning society. And he goes further: it's not enough to just ensure the physical survival of the aging parents; "After all, don't we feed dogs out of mercy?", the ancient philosopher remarks.

The truly noble person, Confucius argues, ought to be looking after their parents both while they are among the living and after their passing. He or she must arrange a dignified funeral and pay them the tribute they deserve. So here we are, 2500 years later, where the PRC has turned this moral imperative into a legal obligation, and failing to comply would lead to penalties.

The new law has already taken its first "victims": http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2013/07/02/chinas-new-filial-piety-law-draws-first-blood/

Read more )
[identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com

Maggie Mae and Shane in happier times. Photograph by Sara Naomi Lewkowicz.



Time magazine ran an photo essay about domestic violence on its website in February, as Congress was debating renewing the Violence Against Women Act. The reactions to the dramatic series of photographs was both immediate and overwhelming. As a follow-up, a short video documentary about that photo essay and its two subjects, Maggie Mae and Shane, was posted on Time's website this week (along with a print article in this week's printed edition). If you aren't familiar about the images some background: Sara Naomi Lewkowicz is a photographer and first year graduate student at Ohio University in Athens. Her project was to document the grueling life of an ex-convict trying to become re-integrated into society, with all the pitfalls (inability to find work, jobs that don't pay a living wage, etc). As Ms. Lewkowicz explains:



Domestic violence is often shielded from public view. Usually, we only hear it muffled through walls or see it manifested in the faded yellow and purple bruises of a woman who “walked into a wall” or “fell down the stairs.” Despite a movement to increase awareness of domestic violence, we still treat it as a private crime, as if it is none of our business.

During my time as a freelance photojournalist and as a Master’s candidate at Ohio University, one of the biggest challenges of my career came in November of 2012, while working on a project about the stigma associated with being an ex-convict. Suddenly, an incident of domestic violence unexpectedly became my business. I had met Shane and Maggie two-and-a-half months before. Southeastern Ohio was still warm that time of year and brimming with small regional festivals. I had gone to the Millersport Sweet Corn Festival to shoot my first assignment for an editorial photography class. Almost immediately, I spotted a man covered in tattoos, including an enormous piece on his neck that read, “Maggie Mae.” He was holding a beautiful little girl with blonde curls. His gentle manner with her belied his intimidating ink, and I approached them to ask if I could take their portrait. I ended up spending my entire time at the fair with Shane, 31, and his girlfriend Maggie, 19. Maggie’s two children, Kayden, four, and Memphis, nearly two, were not Shane’s, but from her then-estranged husband.

Shane and Maggie had started dating a month prior to meeting me, and Shane told me about his struggles with addiction and that he had spent much of his life in prison. Maggie shared her experience losing her mother to a drug overdose at the age of eight, and having the challenges of raising two small children alone while their father, who was in the Army, was stationed in Afghanistan. Before they drove home, I asked if I could continue to document them, and they agreed. I intended to paint a portrait of the catch-22 of being a released ex-convict: even though they are physically free, the metaphorical prison of stigma doesn’t allow them to truly escape. That story changed dramatically one night, after a visit to a bar. In a nearby town where Shane had found temporary work, they stayed with the kids at a friend’s house. That night, at a bar, Maggie had become incensed when another woman had flirted with Shane, and left. Back at the house, Maggie and Shane began fighting. Before long, their yelling escalated into physical violence. Shane attacked Maggie, throwing her into chairs, pushing her up against the wall and choking her in front of her daughter, Memphis.

After I confirmed one of the housemates had called the police, I then continued to document the abuse — my instincts as a photojournalist began kicking in. If Maggie couldn’t leave, neither could I. Eventually, the police arrived. I was fortunate that the responding officers were well educated on First Amendment laws and did not try to stop me from taking pictures. At first, Maggie did not want to cooperate with the officers who led Shane away in handcuffs, but soon after, she changed her mind and gave a statement about the incident. Shane pled guilty to a domestic violence felony and is currently in prison in Ohio.

The incident raised a number of ethical questions. I’ve been castigated by a number of anonymous internet commenters who have said that I should have somehow physically intervened between the two. Their criticism counters what actual law enforcement officers have told me — that physically intervening would have likely only made the situation worse, endangering me, and further endangering Maggie. I have continued to follow Maggie since the abuse, and I’ve also begun working closely with photographer Donna Ferrato, who first began documenting domestic violence 30 years ago.1

















The story of Maggie Mae story is the story of millions of single moms no doubt. She herself was the product of a single parent home (lost her mother when she was 8, and her mother was a recreational drug user). Married early due to pregnancy, both spouses weren't able to cope with the stresses of the relationship, nasty break-up, and Maggie Mae was single mom when she met Shane. It's against that backdrop that the New York City Dept of Health has started a very controversial advertising campaign in an effort to show the pitfalls of being a teenager mom. Many decry the posters and ads as an effort to shame single teen-age mothers. The second image below is from Washington, D.C. near Howard University, and that ad campaign is sponsored by the DC Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, a citizens' action group.



The NYC HD ads make me feel uncomfortable frankly because they lack a lot of empathy for women who are single teenage mothers. But Ms Lewkowicz's photographs and video really hit me on visceral level because one member of my own family has shared a lot Maggie's trials; and shed so many many tears at bringing up children without a supportive father. The struggles of being in your twenties, working low paying jobs and a loneliness you're doing it all alone. Dating and relationships are hard because they're so drained emotionally and physically. There's so many components wrapped up in this tragic story of domestic violence issue. I also wonder about any mental-health treatment for prisoners have. Sure prisoners are being punished for crimes, but obviously Shane has "issues" as Maggie stated, including anger and substance abuse, anger management since he can't cope in a normal relationship. In 2012, the prison population set a record, so effective programs within prisons (or I should say, a LACK of them) is a serious issue affecting all of us, especially considering how many will be released back into society as overcrowded prisons will have early releases.


The video is available @ Time's website since it will not embed properly. Ms. Lewkowicz's visual journalism website, with a write up.


1. Photographer as Witness: A Portrait of Domestic Violence, photo essay by Sara Naomi Lewkowicz. Time, published online February 27, 2013

[identity profile] prog-expat.livejournal.com

A recent conversation elsewhere on the interwebs regarding the same-sex marriage debate has me thinking a lot about red herrings.

You see, the debate about same-sex marriage (specifically in the US, but I think this applies to liberal democratic republics in general) is an absolutely, purely, 100% legal one, with no connection to religion whatsoever. Yet religion gets dragged into the debate time and time again, originally by those opposed, but I'm seeing it used more and more by those in favor, which shows just how pernicious red herrings can be.

Read more... )
[identity profile] dv8nation.livejournal.com
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20863691

Philippines President Benigno Aquino has signed into law a bill providing for free access to contraception and family planning.

Supporters say the law, which took 14 years to pass, will reduce poverty and maternal mortality in a country with the highest birth rate in the region.

The Roman Catholic Church repeatedly tried to block the bill.


First, congrats to the Philippines. With more than seven billion people running around this sort of thing is more important than ever. That said, I'm also feeling frustrated at the very thought of the kind of shitstorm trying to get something like this would stir up in the US. Hell, the foolishness we've seen in regards to insurance is horrible enough.

Still, I like to think that these sort of things add up collectively in regards to change.

[identity profile] nairiporter.livejournal.com
There is a big debate raging among the circles of children's pedagogues and pediatricians about the effect of early kindergarten (nursery). I'm talking of 1-year old kindergarten, or "daycare" as it is known.

On one side, there are experts like Reiner Boehm who are openly opposed to the early daycare practice. In his works, Boehm cites a research document from the National Institute on Child Health and Development which spans 15 years of examination of the mental and behavioural development of 1300 children. What it found was that in their teenage years, children who have been subjected to early daycare, are exhibiting a number of negative effects on their social and emotional competence compared to their peers.

Boehm cites "glaring behavioural deviations", like extraordinary rates of smoking addiction, alcohol consummation, drug use, criminal behaviour and vandalism. And all that, regardless of the quality of the daycare institution that the child has attended. Further, more recent research where children of very early age were examined for their daily levels of the stress hormone cortisol, have shown levels "comparable to those of stressed managers in big companies". The chronic stress of course disrupts brain development and affects behaviour in adulthood. The first two years of the child's development are especially delicate in this respect.

Read more... )
[identity profile] nairiporter.livejournal.com
I recently learned about the deeply moving story of the mother of a 2-grade pupil at the school where I am deputy principal, who had recently become a surrogate mother. Maybe because I have an adopted child myself, a 5 year old boy from Haiti, it struck a chord. This woman is a poor white Afrikaner from the suburbs of the big city, someone who has lived alone for years and who is barely able to make ends meet in this new South Africa where people like her no longer have the privileges they used to have under apartheid. She is looking after her little daughter but is having very hard times.

So, when a German family decided to use the opportunity that the local legislation provides for surrogacy, she was there in the list. And she agreed to give birth to their child, actually two children - twins. They provided the genetic material, it was implanted in her, and earlier this year she gave birth to the babies. The South African legislation allows surrogacy, but there were some serious complications from the German side, because in Germany, surrogacy is considered "immoral and unethical", and the German family almost saw the whole process failing, but for the intervention of a skillful lawyer who was eventually able to find a stipulation in the EU legislation, allowing the father to claim parentage. The story has a happy ending for the twins and the family. The surrogate mother? It's more complicated.

Anyway... long story short, they managed to get the twins, and this poor woman remained here, probably a few thousand dollars more secure than before the whole affair. But what must have remained as well is an emptiness in her, after the children she had given birth to, were voluntarily taken away from her. And I can imagine their new/genetic parents must be having some difficulties back in Germany, coping with the social stigma that comes along with having surrogate children there. Because it is "immoral and unethical"...

I have been to that clinic that provides the surrogacy service a couple of times before. The people I have seen sitting in the waiting room are from all around the world. And they don't come to South Africa for the safari. They want to have children. People from Europe, Australia, Canada... the one thing that could be seen in their eyes, is hope. Hope for an ending of their desperation, as many of them are unable to have children for one reason or another. And, hope and desperation must have been what has moved all those women who have agreed to "lend" their bodies to carry the children for these people.

Read more... )
[identity profile] airiefairie.livejournal.com

Toys leave a mark in the childhood of every child. All of us have had a special one, a toy that we specially remember, inherited from a brother, a Christmas wish come true, or even a toy made by yourself, that toy that was undoubtedly your number one because you put so much love into making it. Toys also reveal a lot about the character of a kid - the way they think, what are their dreams, what life they have...

An Italian photographer by the name Gabriele Galimberti has gone around the world in a set of photographs, exploring this phenomenon. With the help and consent of parents, he discovered through children games how they develop the game and which is their favourite toy. In a sense, this is a scientific exposition, where kids show with pride their treasures that tell us some more of their lives.

Come delve into the mysteries of the child's mind! )

What about your kids? What toys do they like playing with? =)
 
[identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
Peace, my dear chronic haterz nice tolerant peeps who just want harmony in the world! Care to take a glimpse of the "nice" place that is the Balkan Internet, eh? In this case it's this legendary cesspit that is Blog.bg. See, there's a Pride Parade today in Sofia, which is a pretty big event. And of course that's been the central topic throughout the blogosphere for the whole week. I've been puking all over the place lately, as I've realized that the majority of bloggers are pretty much on the homophobic side of the issue. Just one among thousands of examples:

http://stoineff.blog.bg/lifestyle/2012/06/26/shte-hodite-li-na-gei-parada.972660

Rough translation:

"This year Warlick [the US ambassador to BG] will be attending the gay pride parade in Sofia. You know, we're supposed to be tolerant with them f**s. To protect their rights and freedoms. To help them keep parading with their wickedness and allow them to keep touching themselves on the wrong holes. Bulgarian f**s unite, hah! We're tolerant and we support y'all; if next year you decide to adopt kids and marry each other, we'll support you again. As the song goes, "...your heart is as wide as the ass of a f**. Brb, gonna vomit now".

The author of this genius post even used this pic, with the comment: "They probably use these toilet brushes to wash their asses afterwards..."



But in fact the truly sickening thing here is all the hatred )
[identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
The other day I heard a twenty-something acquaintance say, in passing, "Mirkarimi mauled his wife." I had recently had a conversation with some students on the topic of homeless pets so I immediately associated the young woman's remark with being mauled by a pit bull. Naturally I winced at the comment. As I reflected on it later, I thought of another definition of "maul" as a tool that laborers use for a variety of constructive and destructive tasks. The tool has even been used to stun cattle for slaughter. This association reinforced my earlier recoil.

San Francisco's embattled Sheriff-elect, Ross Mirkarimi, recently addressed a Democratic club with his assessment of the situation. He pointed out that the courts have yet to allow him to speak with his wife. He also described his take on the Mayor's actions suspending him on an ethics charge. I was not surprised by the latter remarks. After all, San Francisco's plutocracy has Mayor Ed Lee's gonads firmly in hand. The news that he could not speak to his wife struck me as rather extreme. It reminded me of former times when a judge would cut off a man's nose for the offense of stealing a loaf of bread. The punishment was out of proportion to the crime. It also arbitrarily punishes Eliana Lopez, Mirkarimi's wife.

Mirkarimi has admitted to errors in the way he argued with his wife over a planned visit to Venezuela. At a different Democratic club meeting, he explained the bruise on his wife's arm as the result of a hasty tug on her arm during an emotional moment. It was not the most diplomatic of actions, nor was it the brutal mauling portrayed by his political opponents.

Eliana Lopez has criticized the Mayor for releasing the shock video that got the whole event rolling. Her attorney was in the process of requesting a stay on its release. She fears the psychological damage it may cause her child. The video contains nothing that has not already appeared in the press, except for a close view of some of the evidence that had been used to convict Mirkarimi in the court of public opinion. Back in April, Ms. Lopez observed, "What has happened to my family is wrong. What has occurred has hurt not just me and Ross and our son, Theo, but also society in general."

Does this case leave you feeling that the wheels of justice work just fine, or do you see a sinister assault on this particular family?

Links: Ms. Lopez speaks out on the affair. The shock video. Ross Mirkarimi speaks out this month and on a prior occasion. Maul as an instrument for slaughter.
[identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
This is your regular, if not so frequent, installment of hypothetical political situations that need a single decision, taken from the [Poll #1827224]

Of course, as always, the possible solutions are purposefully extreme and stratified - whether for the lulz or to draw the lines more clearly.

[identity profile] airiefairie.livejournal.com
Several female members of the EU parliament became a sensation when they brought their little kids to the sessions of the most important European institution in Strasbourg. Some say they are making a political statement with this act, while they themselves state more practical reasons to do it. But either way, this has highlighted how difficult it is for women to reconcile career with family life.

The Italian MEP Licia Ronzulli who became famous for carrying her infant in her arms wrapped in a scarf, said that "Women are expected to study, and have a decent job, and after all that they have to choose between making a career and having a personal life. Women should not be forced to make such a choice". These words are what has made some call this a new form of political activism, but they may be missing the more important point.


Read more... )
[identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
San Francisco County recently installed a new sheriff in office for the first time in thirty years. His wife is a Venezuelan TV celebrity who has been having a tough time starting her own family far from her family support network. The domestic quarrels of the handsome couple became public just as the new sheriff was being sworn into office. The way people react to the incident gives us a good insight into how they process information and how they participate in the political process. Prejudice shows in the ways that people draw conclusions based on the scant evidence that has leaked from the judicial system. (Malfeasance can be gauged from the act of leaking such evidence.)

When asked his opinion on the matter, a liberal man responded that the Sheriff has "issues" because there was more than one incident of alleged abuse. Less liberal commentators focus on the neighbor who dropped a dime on the lovers' spat or on the connection to Latino melodrama. Those of us with sympathy for both partners despair over the way their private lives have been dragged into the public spotlight against the wills of all involved, including the over-zealous neighbor.

The liberal assumption that the Sheriff suffers from some sort of mental illness relates to a false paradigm of mental processing that is prevalent in liberal circles. Robert Bellah might tie it to a religion of psychotherapy that has become prevalent in pill bottle culture. Leftist literature, such as the work of Herbert Marcuse, cautions us on the inadequacy of treating environmental problems with individual therapy. Medical literature, such as the work of Thomas Szasz, cautions us against armchair diagnosis of disease where no physical pathology exists. Liberal prejudice avoids rational analysis and assumes a medical condition exists.

Poor people are less susceptible to the liberal delusion because they are forced to be more independent of the medical profession. They have a healthy skepticism of medical practice due to extensive experience with medical malpractice. There is a sense of the limitations of the drug and the knife that liberals lack. From the liberal perspective, the poor suffer from medical neglect. Unwittingly, liberals themselves suffer from medical negligence.

What prejudices do you bring to your perspectives on domestic political violence?
[identity profile] meus-ovatio.livejournal.com
I've been musing about something. Beware, for I have mused and you are now subject to its consequences! Something came up with got me thinking about family and how class continuity can effect politics. For instance, anecdote-wise, about 3/4ths of those I know are worse off than their parents than their parents were at their age. The rest are either about the same or better off. What I have noticed is how some family mindsets are undergoing radical change due to class faults. Sure, families have always been schismatic, politically speaking. You have conservative wings and liberal wings and all that. But there is a certain break-down in communication occurring, as children are "left behind". Fathers and mothers are increasingly tut-tutting and murmuring, "I don't envy you guys."

On a deeper level, this is a radical redefinition of American attitudes. Not simply that America can be a place where the family legacy gets better, ever and ever upwards over time. But rather that families are simply happy with maintaining their status-quo. A lot of families have simply given up on the idea that they or their progeny will actually get more and more over time. Great swaths of America have plateaued.

But the deeper breakdown is that a 60s-90s middle-class American mindset is entirely different than a declining middle-class 2000s mindset. People are getting disgusted with their churches. Kids are revolting against the "happy-happy everything is grand" mindset of the housewife and successful father. Religious discourse and advice-giving is increasingly met with disdain as the next generation is given doses of meaningless bourgeois prattle about God, jobs and life.

Arguments are not simply political, but social and spiritual. A whole generation is saying, "That doesn't work!" It is not an argument, but a serious conflict. Not simply a "generational divide" between equally bourgeois groups arguing about politics or technology or whatever. But sharp, class-based logics running into each other.

But the more abstract question is what do these early fault-lines entail for the political process?

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Summary

OSZAR »