[identity profile] dv8nation.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics

http://news.yahoo.com/u-health-body-recommends-birth-control-coverage-181409769.html

A U.S. medical advisory group recommended providing women free birth control and other preventive health services under the nation's healthcare overhaul.

The Institute of Medicine report, commissioned by the Obama administration, recommended that all U.S.-approved birth control methods -- including the "morning after pill," taken shortly after intercourse to forestall pregnancy -- be added to the federal government's list of preventive health services.

"The evidence supporting contraception is quite straightforward. It works," said Dr. Alfred Berg, a member of IOM's Committee on Preventive Services for Women.


Well, if it didn't work then there wouldn't be much point in selling it, would there? *ahem* Okay, smartass asides aside I fully agree with the this idea. People who aren't really interested in being parents tend to not make the best parents. Yes, I'm making a generalization. Live with it.

However, as expected, there is opposition to this.

Without sufficient legal protection for rights of conscience, such a mandate would force all men, women and children to carry health coverage that violates the deeply-held moral and religious convictions of many," said Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, chairman of the Committee on Pro-Life Activities of the bishops' conference.

Ya know, somehow I doubt little Johnny gives a fuck where the sales tax on his Slurpee will be spent by Uncle Sam. But I think this position is absurd. The US is a representative democracy. That means, for good or ill, the people we vote for get to decide how the $ gets spent. Complaining like this is like saying that a pacifist shouldn't have their tax dollars spent on jet fighters.

Top Gun hatin' hippies aside, it's just unworkable that we should all get to decide just where our tax dollars get spent. It would be a paperwork nightmare that makes dealing with a FAFSA seems like a walk in the park. Then there's collection and making sure every penny went where it was intended. Madness! Madness, I tell you.

Living according to your values is your job. Spending your taxes in whys that will benefit the US as a whole is the government's job.

I disagree.

Date: 20/7/11 16:46 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
Given modern machine technology, it should not be difficult to tailor spending to the ideological profile of the taxpayer. It would be interesting to see how the chips would fall if only decent people funded social programs and only vicious people funded military programs.

Re: I disagree.

Date: 20/7/11 22:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
Au contraire. You can simply thank those with the foresight to fund the FDA that your pharmaceuticals are safe and effectives. I would thank those who funded the military for the slaughter of civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Re: I disagree.

Date: 21/7/11 03:35 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com
Fuck that, if I funded the FDA you don't get any of the information. Stay blue smurfy.

Re: I disagree.

Date: 21/7/11 19:27 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
The FDA does little to police the drug trade. What they do is approve drugs for their safety and efficacy. (Doctors can still prescribe drugs for uses other than those not specified by the manufacturer.) There is no process for health care professionals to discriminate based on tax information. Your sinister plan fails miserably.

Re: I disagree.

Date: 21/7/11 19:29 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
How do you know that they were all that bad? Their case has not been heard in a court of law. You are easily deceived.

Re: I disagree.

Date: 21/7/11 21:59 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
I have seen the aftermath of some of the war crimes committed during WW II. If membership in the Axis is reason enough to be deep sixed, the same could be said for membership in the Allies.

Re: I disagree.

Date: 22/7/11 00:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
I am familiar with the pattern: two kids are pestering one another and each one blames the other. Both bear responsibility for the conflict. Where you see halos, I see pitchforks.

As for machine heuristics, if you got to see some of the stuff that is in development these days, you would excrete a brick.

Re: I disagree.

Date: 23/7/11 23:08 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
I am sure that you do not have a view of some of the more esoteric research.

Re: I disagree.

Date: 24/7/11 22:06 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
I judge by your approach. You are either in-the-know, or very good at pretending not to be.

Re: I disagree.

Date: 29/7/11 17:52 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
Sorry. I should have said that either you are not in the know, or are good at pretending.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Clearly, the penguins have finally gone too far. First they take our hearts, now they’re tanking the global economy one smug waddle at a time. Expect fish sanctions by Friday."

July 2025

M T W T F S S
  123 456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Summary

OSZAR »