ext_306469 ([identity profile] paft.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics2011-07-16 10:14 am
Entry tags:

They Could Always Go Work in Factories

Teri Adams, Head of Independence Hall Tea Party and School Voucher Activist:

Our ultimate goal is to shut down public schools and have private schools only, eventually returning responsibility for payment to parents and private charities. It’s going to happen piecemeal and not overnight. It took us years to get into this mess and it’s going to take years to get out of it.



In other words, Adams would like education to be, along with medical care, available only to those who can pony up the cash for it.

The article I’ve linked to includes a few quotes from people speculating about what drives the American right’s hostility towards public education. The ban on teacher-led prayer is invoked, along with the mercenary desire to funnel the money now paid into public schools into private hands.

I suspect it’s much more simple than that. Without universal education, the far right wouldn’t have to contend with so many pesky arguments about the facts of history, math, science, etc.

Crossposted from Thoughtcrimes

*

Re: What an adorable strawman.

[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com 2011-07-18 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Which is horseshit of the finest quality for manuring one's fields. The West had railroads, settlements, applied for territorial and state status rather quickly, and the influence of the Lincoln Administration's Homestead Act made the Wild West inconceivable without it. Sorry, this is not how anarcho-capitalism works in the real world.
(deleted comment)

Re: What an adorable strawman.

[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com 2011-07-18 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually if one's analogy of how libertarianism works in practice is the Wild West, it *is* bullshit. The only semi-viable analogy would be the conquistadors when they happened to win.
(deleted comment)

Re: Yes, dear. Whatever you say, dear.

[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com 2011-07-18 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Because the conquistadors were actually people working for themselves who did start out a second son of a noble and wound up kings of encomiendas. But that requires an argument beyond neener-neener.
(deleted comment)

Re: Yes, dear. Whatever you say, dear.

[identity profile] squidb0i.livejournal.com 2011-07-19 02:57 pm (UTC)(link)
lol, totally stealing that..