ext_306469 ([identity profile] paft.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics2011-07-16 10:14 am
Entry tags:

They Could Always Go Work in Factories

Teri Adams, Head of Independence Hall Tea Party and School Voucher Activist:

Our ultimate goal is to shut down public schools and have private schools only, eventually returning responsibility for payment to parents and private charities. It’s going to happen piecemeal and not overnight. It took us years to get into this mess and it’s going to take years to get out of it.



In other words, Adams would like education to be, along with medical care, available only to those who can pony up the cash for it.

The article I’ve linked to includes a few quotes from people speculating about what drives the American right’s hostility towards public education. The ban on teacher-led prayer is invoked, along with the mercenary desire to funnel the money now paid into public schools into private hands.

I suspect it’s much more simple than that. Without universal education, the far right wouldn’t have to contend with so many pesky arguments about the facts of history, math, science, etc.

Crossposted from Thoughtcrimes

*

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] midsummerskies.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 06:08 pm (UTC)(link)
you don't think education and health care are human rights?

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] mintogrubb.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 06:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Of course not. If these people cannot get your money by selling it to you, you are not allowed to have it. Hell, they bottle and sell water, you know. What makes you think they will let you have health and education on tap?

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] midsummerskies.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 06:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Hell, they bottle and sell water, you know. What makes you think they will let you have health and education on tap?

That's not really a good comparison though because you can get water for free

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] mintogrubb.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
But they will still try and sell it - I mean . I can get water from my tap, I can filter it at home and stick it in the fridge.
Why would I want to buy packaged and bottled water, I wonder. Carbonated, I can understand, but Just Plain Water?

The thinking is, if we can't make a buck on this, lets abolish it. or at least discredit it so people will come to us instead.

Seriously, have you not heard of the Nestle Boycott?

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] midsummerskies.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 06:26 pm (UTC)(link)
but the ting is, in western countries you can still get water for free. I don't believe in private education but I have a lot less problem with it if there is free education as well

of course I've heard of the nestle boycott, what does it have to do with this?
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

[identity profile] harry-beast.livejournal.com - 2011-07-17 04:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] mintogrubb.livejournal.com - 2011-07-17 14:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] harry-beast.livejournal.com - 2011-07-17 19:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com - 2011-07-17 09:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] soliloquy76.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 07:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Of course they're not rights. They are, however, a public good, and depending on your ideology, they should not be profit-driven and available to everyone.

Unfortunately, our government is closely tied to big business, and ideologically split by a wide margin, so any government-based solution is going to be diluted by these things. A combination of private and public solutions, IMO, is the best path.

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] midsummerskies.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)
why "of course"?

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] soliloquy76.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 08:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Because they're not defined as such. Words mean things.

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] midsummerskies.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 08:21 pm (UTC)(link)
yes they are
Article 25 of the Universal declaration of Human rights (http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/#atop)


Article 25.

(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
(2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

article 26
(1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.
(2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.


Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] nevermind6794.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)
If they are a public good, does that not mean people have a right to them? Clean air is a public good, and I would argue that people have a right to it.

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] soliloquy76.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 08:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, this is where it becomes a semantic argument. Technically speaking, education and health care are not rights.

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] jerseycajun.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 07:03 pm (UTC)(link)
*plays broken record* Regardless of whether or not one agrees with the policy of government provided health care and education, fundamentally these things are not appropriate to characterize as rights. A right which is violated has consequences for the person who committed the violation. The condition for violation of a right to health care or education is the passive one which involves simply lacking one or both of those things, yet because it is a passive state of being, there can be no one who is held responsible for it when it happens the way, say a murderer can be held directly responsible for violating his victim's right to life.

These things are better described for what they are, regardless of what side of the political spectrum one finds ones self on:

Services.

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] jerseycajun.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 07:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Considering that in order to do so on the part of one citizen against another, that would mean holding the victim against their will to threatening them with violence, we do have laws that punish these things with incarceration.

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] midsummerskies.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)
A right which is violated has consequences for the person who committed the violation.

no a right which is violated should have consequences for the person who committed the violation but often doesn't

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] jerseycajun.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 08:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Who commits the violation that results in someone not getting health care? I'm not talking about negligence cases either.

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] nevermind6794.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)
A right which is violated has consequences for the person who committed the violation.

A right is better characterized as freedom from or entitlement to something for no reason other than being. The "freedom from" and "entitlement to" are often flip sides of the same thing; freedom from violations of liberty can also be described as an entitlement to liberty. But even if we accept your system, there are consequences for people who keep their children from having an education, or having appropriate health care, for example.

These things are better described for what they are, regardless of what side of the political spectrum one finds ones self on:

Services.


The only service is the practical application of those rights that have already been determined to exist. The military exists to protect certain liberties, and voter registration workers exist because people are entitled to a vote; I wouldn't characterize either as primarily services.

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] jerseycajun.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 08:50 pm (UTC)(link)
"A right is better characterized as freedom from or entitlement to something for no reason other than being."

Except that the two are at fundamental odds with one another. That we have delineated terms like positive and negative rights is one of the indications of this. One is passive, the other active. Insofar as it moves in one direction, ground is given up by the other.

I prefer a characterization which does not conflict on such a basic level.

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] montecristo.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 07:46 pm (UTC)(link)
You have a right to pursue happiness. Such a pursuit may involve trading goods or services for knowledge, technology, information, or wisdom that someone else possesses. You have a right to trade what you legitimately possess for things legitimately possessed by others. There can be no right to have what someone else must produce. Such a "right" is self-contradictory. The name for it is "slavery."

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] midsummerskies.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)
don't be rediculous

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] montecristo.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 08:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Being rediculous would be ridiculous.

Slavery is the institution whereby some group, the slave owners, are entitled, by right, supposedly, to claim some portion of the products of the time labor and efforts of others, the slaves. There is nothing ridiculous in the claim that the assertion that education is a right is effectively a claim of slave ownership on those who would be presumed to be obligated to teach, or to provide funds to that end.

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com 2011-07-17 08:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually it's called civilization.

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] montecristo.livejournal.com 2011-07-17 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, you and Thomas Carlyle would have gotten along famously.

Re: Public education is political indoctrination paid for by theft

[identity profile] rasilio.livejournal.com 2011-07-16 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Sure education is a basic human right, it is in fact one of the few rights which can be said to actually exist because you know what, short of being locked into a sensory deprivation tank and fed through a tube from the moment of birth you WILL get an education. The specific form it takes, the skills and knowledge it will comprise will vary from person to person based on their experiences but every human who has ever lived has received an education and there is pretty much nothing anyone can do to stop it from happening.


Now if what you meant to say was actually SCHOOLING, then no, it is not a basic human right.