[identity profile] kinvore.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
I never thought I'd see anyone put their name behind a bill like this anytime soon:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110623/ap_on_go_co/us_pot_bill

It's a proposal to decriminalize marijuana. While technically bipartisan (Ron Paul is a co-sponsor) there is virtually no chance of it passing a Republican-controlled House. It's not all the GOP's fault, though. Few Democrats will go on the record as being opposed to marijuana prohibition, including our President.

We shouldn't be sending people to jail for smoking a damned plant. Anyone who claims to want less government in our lives is a hypocrite if they oppose this bill.

I know, I know. Hypocrisy in politics, color us surprised.

(no subject)

Date: 24/6/11 02:45 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] soliloquy76.livejournal.com
I love this part:
The bill would have to go through the House Judiciary Committee. Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, said his panel would not consider it.

"Marijuana use and distribution is prohibited under federal law because it has a high potential for abuse and does not have an accepted medical use in the U.S.," Smith said. "The Food and Drug Administration has not approved smoked marijuana for any condition or disease.

"Decriminalizing marijuana will only lead to millions more Americans becoming addicted to drugs and greater profits for drug cartels who fund violence along the U.S.-Mexico border. Allowing states to determine their own marijuana policy flies in the face of Supreme Court precedent."
The entire thing reeks of bullshit, but it's particularly telling that Republicans don't really care about smaller federal government and deferring to states.

(no subject)

Date: 24/6/11 02:53 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] notmrgarrison.livejournal.com

"Decriminalizing marijuana will only lead to millions more Americans becoming addicted to drugs and greater profits for drug cartels


Holy crap.

(no subject)

Date: 24/6/11 03:19 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com
Yeah, because after prohibition ended Mafia bootlegging profits soared through the roof!

Or they just switched to heroin.

(no subject)

Date: 24/6/11 03:58 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] notmrgarrison.livejournal.com
It reminded me of the congressman who said poker was all luck, though this is even worse.

(no subject)

Date: 24/6/11 22:26 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
We already know that politicians don't have a handle on how economics work.

(no subject)

Date: 25/6/11 23:49 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] napoleonofcrime.livejournal.com
An acquaintance of mine, a small-time dealer, was against legalization because he didn't want his little business to have to compete with Pfizer.

(no subject)

Date: 24/6/11 04:11 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-new-machine.livejournal.com
The bit about precedent is amusing as hell, too. States don't get to set their own policy because the federal government preempts the field. It has nothing to do with anything inherent about marijuana.

(no subject)

Date: 24/6/11 04:33 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com
not have an accepted medical use in the U.S.

Except for by most people and academics and states...

(no subject)

Date: 24/6/11 06:06 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com
You and your inconvenient facts!

(no subject)

Date: 24/6/11 22:26 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
And also because the feds don't let anyone research it to see if there is medical use that could be acceptable.

(no subject)

Date: 24/6/11 05:28 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jerseycajun.livejournal.com
It has such a high potential for abuse that all three of our most recent presidents have all copped to doing it at some point and yet still managed not to end up wandering the streets in a drug-addled rage.

Indeed, the whole thing reeks. It's rather shocking that the facade is still being so vigorously held up.

Let's run Rep Smith's criteria against alcohol.

High potential for abuse? Self-evident. Check.
No accepted medical use? Check.
Lack of FDA approval for medicinal purposes? Check.

(no subject)

Date: 24/6/11 17:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
Or video games. A scourge I tell you.

(no subject)

Date: 24/6/11 17:28 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/-wanderer-/
yet still managed not to end up wandering the streets in a drug-addled rage.

That we know of!

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
1617 1819 202122
2324 2526 272829
30      

Summary

OSZAR »