![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
America Becoming a Nation of Freeloaders?
That's the intro to the whole 1 hour special that was on last Friday. I can't find the whole thing online yet, maybe someone else can. Here's a link to the original piece that John Stossel did years ago. And some of the topics covered in the new special are described in Stossel's blog.
To me, this is the ultimate in patriotism, identifying the problems with our government rather than blindly accepting them. Recognizing that trying to help a few has unintended consequences that need to be dealt with. Cutting corporate welfare is smart. That maybe if we stopped giving away money to those who don't need it we might not have to raise taxes on anyone.
Unfortunately, as Stossel's earlier piece shows, I think our society is too far gone down the entitlement track to fix this problem, so I have no hope things will get better.
That's the intro to the whole 1 hour special that was on last Friday. I can't find the whole thing online yet, maybe someone else can. Here's a link to the original piece that John Stossel did years ago. And some of the topics covered in the new special are described in Stossel's blog.
In big government America today, it’s rich people who freeload the most. Corporations do it. And rich individuals do it. People like me...Eventually, a storm swept away my first floor. But I didn’t lose a penny. Thanks! I never invited you there, but you paid for my new first floor. A few years later, the whole house went. Again, government flood insurance covered my loss.
To me, this is the ultimate in patriotism, identifying the problems with our government rather than blindly accepting them. Recognizing that trying to help a few has unintended consequences that need to be dealt with. Cutting corporate welfare is smart. That maybe if we stopped giving away money to those who don't need it we might not have to raise taxes on anyone.
Unfortunately, as Stossel's earlier piece shows, I think our society is too far gone down the entitlement track to fix this problem, so I have no hope things will get better.
(no subject)
Date: 29/3/11 01:39 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 29/3/11 06:08 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 29/3/11 16:44 (UTC)Means testing and caps
Date: 29/3/11 02:07 (UTC)For other payments, simply set a maximum amount of payment. Using flood insurance as an example, make it twice the national average family home.
Pick some reasonable threshold beyond which the government smiles and says you don't need our help. Besides we already spend all your taxes paying police and the fire department to give you the services your privileged ass demands.
Re: Means testing and caps
Date: 29/3/11 06:09 (UTC)Re: Means testing and caps
Date: 30/3/11 06:08 (UTC)Re: Means testing and caps
From:(no subject)
Date: 29/3/11 02:28 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 29/3/11 06:10 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 29/3/11 02:51 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 29/3/11 03:16 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 29/3/11 04:24 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 29/3/11 06:12 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Right on the money
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 29/3/11 05:14 (UTC)Cutting corporate welfare is a spiffy idea but given how addicted elected officials are to servicing the wealthy I question if it will ever happen.
(no subject)
Date: 29/3/11 22:13 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:John Stossel
Date: 29/3/11 13:36 (UTC)He conducts himself reasonably, without the shrillness that many of these pundits have.
But I don't get Fox Business channel, so I've only seen his specials so far.
(no subject)
Date: 29/3/11 15:15 (UTC)The government 'subsidy' amounts to secondary insurance which was difficult to get from commercial sources for flooding. One can argue that inexpensive insurance leads to more development in flood-prone areas, but it is hardly freeloading.
(no subject)
Date: 30/3/11 00:49 (UTC)_________
Now, in all truth the USA, with the most stingy welfare system of the rich countries and the largest defense expenditures in the world is not going to collapse if we spend money on helping people instead of on million-dollar ashtrays for Generals and Admirals.
(no subject)
Date: 30/3/11 00:52 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/3/11 05:36 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/3/11 04:23 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/3/11 05:47 (UTC)I don't know any small government types that approve of corporate welfare.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 31/3/11 01:44 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/4/11 06:43 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/4/11 19:50 (UTC)