(no subject)

Date: 2/10/18 07:56 (UTC)
johnny9fingers: (0)
I think the context of the current interpretation of the Second Amendment means this sort of thing, if not commonplace, can't be stopped. Any disturbed figure with a bunch of guns could have done the same.

Mall and School shootings are the price you pay for freedom. (Well one specific freedom - the one to have personal projectile weapons available at all times.)

Who knew that the US constitution demanded such potential sacrifices? And who thought such potential could be turned into actuality? Not the guys who drafted the Constitution, obviously.

The strength about a written constitution is the difficulty in changing things; it is also its weakness, as can be seen with Second amendment issues. The strength of Parliamentary sovereignty is it's easy to change things; it is also a weakness, especially after a plebiscite.

Maybe all polities get the fuck-ups they deserve.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      
OSZAR »