12/6/09

[identity profile] lordtwinkie.livejournal.com
I know this isn't the topic de jour at the moment but I found it interesting anyways!
So one things that comes up when arguing gun control laws is the "whats next knives?" argument, which is then ridiculed by gun control advocates saying don't be silly. Well I say to you, what about knives?
Lets look at Britain, which has extremely strict gun control laws.



Thugs committing 350 knife assaults EVERY DAY, as blade menace spreads to rural areas. according to dailymail.co.uk

apparently theres is serious public concerns over knife crime, following a spate of horrific murders in recent months, many involving young victims in inner city areas.

Firearms offences recorded by police rose 2 per cent last year to reach a total of 9,803, while homicides were up three per cent to 784.

The latest figures show how the shadow of 'Blade Britain' has spread from urban areas to the shires....

Mr Johnston called for more robust stop-and-search tactics.

'We must get back to the time when members of the public accept that even if they have done nothing wrong, and are not carrying a knife, they must not object to a police officer questioning them and in some cases searching them,' he said.

'The police need the public support from all communities to do that.'
...

Of the 22,151 knife crimes in England and Wales last year, 231 related to attempted murders; 5,248 were cases of wounding with intent; 2,785 were cases of grievous bodily harm; 2,359 related to robbery of business property and a further 11,528 were connected to the robbery of personal property....

Officers have become increasingly concerned about the way blades have become a weapon of choice for a new generation of teenage thugs.




theres even a nice little picture showing the spread of the "blade menace"
Read more... )
[identity profile] madali.livejournal.com


Voted for the first time ever in my life today for Mir Hossein Mousavi. I'm not a Ahmedinijad hater like majority of Mousavi supporters, I just think he isn't the leader we need at the moment. I'd rather someone a bit more intellectual, classy, and even boring, who can quietly try to lead Iran in a more organized path, and I think Mousavi is better than Ahmedinijad in this regard.

I don't expect a sea of liberal change from Mousavi, nor do I desire it. I don't give a shit about a lot of western and upper class Iranian concerns, I'd rather see a change on Iran's economic front.

We'll see the results tommorrow. If no one gets over 50% of the votes, then it will go to a second round, with the top two. The voting for that will be next week, and I'm not sure if the voting fever will remain or will cool off. I for one don't know if I'll vote again.

Iranian's this year have been very excited about voting, and in typical Iranian fashion, everything becomes a family outing. Another family joined our family, and we drove all the way to the polls to vote. We voted in Sharjah, UAE, and it is great to know that even with all the puffings between UAE and Iran, they still have good enough relationship to allow several points in the Emirates for Iranians to vote. We went to an exhibition center, and there were Emarati police and army personal to help keep security up, with an organized Iranian members to ensure polling is easy. We gave our passport, they gave us a form, and I put my fingerprint on the other half (not the voting half). In the voting form, I wrote down Mousavi's name (there is no checklist) and his voting code (77!).

There are those people that claim that Iranian's election doesnt count because it is not a complete democracy, and I'd dispute that because democracy comes in many shapes and forms, and Iran's election process is no less worthy than many other countries. No one man can bring 100% change, but then neither can most candidates differ all that much from the previous government in most countries either, And people claim that the President doesn't have complete power, and so what? I think of this as an advantage, discouraging any new person to completly consolodate power. We're voting for the post of presidency, with specific job responsibilities, not the Shah of Iran.

There has been lots of reports in western media trying to throw cold water over the election by claiming that Mousavi is not that different from Ahmedinijad because he supports the nuclear program. Of course, this is not what we Iranian's are voting for. This program existed before Ahmedinijad and will exist after Ahmedinijad and none of the candidates claimed they will stop it, and nor would I feel happy if that is what they said.

Well, either way, wish us luck!

[identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
Wow, I've seen the light. Obama is obviously the saviour of our nation and never wrong.

Obama defends DOMA in federal court. Says banning gay marriage is good for the federal budget. Invokes incest and marrying children.

I guess I'm now on the bandwagon with all the other liberals who think he's greatest president our nation could have ever gotten. I'm sorry I made fun of you foolsenlightened folks who voted for him.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      
OSZAR »