Obama and Judgment
7/1/09 09:40![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
Food for thought, especially since we haven't even seen Obama take office officially yet.
The chief argument during the campaign regarding Ayers, Wright et al was the judgment issue - Obama lacking the judgment to competently select those he associates with. Now we see:
* Rahm Emanuel (Freddie Mac, Blago)
* Three Constitutionally invalid appointments in Clinton, Salazar, and Solis.
* Bill Richardson. (Under investigation)
* Sonal Shah (Alignment with militant Hindu group)
* Sanjay Gupta (who's next, Jim Kramer at Commerce?)
* Leon Panetta (zero experience in area he was appointed to)
* Possibly RFK Jr. (anti-science
That's 8 choices right away that are problematic, and you and I both know there will be more coming down the pike. Worse, we're not talking partisan complaints, either - all the names on this list have issues surrounding them that have nothing to do with party or ideology.
This doesn't even approach more partisan issues with folks like Rick Warren (convocation evangelical), Timothy Geithner (former Bush official who Obama said wasn't doing his job regulating the financial industry) or Robert Gates (current Bush Sec of Defense).
Doesn't this suggest that judgment as an issue was pretty spot-on? Can we expect it to get better?
The chief argument during the campaign regarding Ayers, Wright et al was the judgment issue - Obama lacking the judgment to competently select those he associates with. Now we see:
* Rahm Emanuel (Freddie Mac, Blago)
* Three Constitutionally invalid appointments in Clinton, Salazar, and Solis.
* Bill Richardson. (Under investigation)
* Sonal Shah (Alignment with militant Hindu group)
* Sanjay Gupta (who's next, Jim Kramer at Commerce?)
* Leon Panetta (zero experience in area he was appointed to)
* Possibly RFK Jr. (anti-science
That's 8 choices right away that are problematic, and you and I both know there will be more coming down the pike. Worse, we're not talking partisan complaints, either - all the names on this list have issues surrounding them that have nothing to do with party or ideology.
This doesn't even approach more partisan issues with folks like Rick Warren (convocation evangelical), Timothy Geithner (former Bush official who Obama said wasn't doing his job regulating the financial industry) or Robert Gates (current Bush Sec of Defense).
Doesn't this suggest that judgment as an issue was pretty spot-on? Can we expect it to get better?