If it was a gun-free zone, then why was this person allowed to carry a gun inside? If there is a rule but it is not being enforced, then it is not a rule, it is a recommendation - which means it is useless. If there was armed security at the entrance, the guy would not be able to enter with a gun, and he would either have to go away, or get into a scuffle with the guards, and risk compromising his "mission".
The problem is not with the rule/law. It is with the enforcement. Now, I am aware that you cannot put armed security at every bar or cafeteria in town. But if you are going to put a rule/law in place, better be prepared to have someone around to enforce it.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 14/6/16 05:45 (UTC)The problem is not with the rule/law. It is with the enforcement. Now, I am aware that you cannot put armed security at every bar or cafeteria in town. But if you are going to put a rule/law in place, better be prepared to have someone around to enforce it.