(no subject)

Date: 9/10/14 07:45 (UTC)
The problem is, the US has been finding time and time again that none of these proxies are trustworthy in the long run, ever since 9-11. Once they've served their purpose and done their job in a particular conflict, they soon tend to degenerate and become a thorn in the ass rather than an asset - and unfortunately, there's no way to just order them to disarm and dismantle voluntarily. That's a classic example of good intentions leading to bad results, thanks to short-sightedness in the strategy-making process. The US either consistently fails to notice the pattern, or its leaders just don't care about the outcome that much.

That's the problem basically, yep. Well laid down.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
1617 1819 202122
2324 2526 272829
30      
OSZAR »