Even if monarchy is not a cause of problems, and even if it does that while giving benefits, if those benefits are possible without monarchy,it would be better to have the benefits from a different route.
If it turns out that monarchy was best, I would support it. I believe it is not best. At best, it is tied for best. The fact that people are deemed special because of a blood-line is problematic. We shouldn't consider anyone a king or queen. We are all people and equality demands the abolition of a landed, moneyed, powerful ruling class that is blood based.
The only possible justification for a person having land/money/power is that they earned it.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 14/4/13 01:00 (UTC)Even if monarchy is not a cause of problems, and even if it does that while giving benefits, if those benefits are possible without monarchy,it would be better to have the benefits from a different route.
If it turns out that monarchy was best, I would support it. I believe it is not best. At best, it is tied for best. The fact that people are deemed special because of a blood-line is problematic. We shouldn't consider anyone a king or queen. We are all people and equality demands the abolition of a landed, moneyed, powerful ruling class that is blood based.
The only possible justification for a person having land/money/power is that they earned it.